VIPSolutions logo ✨ VIPSolutions

An electron is confined to a finite well of width 0.5 nm and height 5.0 eV. Use an iterative approach to find the energy of the first ground state and first excited state to three significant figures.

Question:

An electron is confined to a finite well of width 0.5 nm and height 5.0 eV. Use an iterative approach to find the energy of the first ground state and first excited state to three significant figures.

This is AI generated Response.
Asked by: Adapaka Jagadeesh
Created at: 2025-07-29 14:44:42

Final Answer:

Rendered Raw Text
Did you like this answer?
Let's solve for the energy levels of an electron in a **finite square well** of: - Width \( L = 0.5\,\text{nm} = 0.5 \times 10^{-9}\,\text{m} \) - Well depth \( V_0 = 5.0\,\text{eV} \) - Electron mass \( m = 9.11 \times 10^{-31}\,\text{kg} \) - \( \hbar = 1.055 \times 10^{-34}\,\text{J}\cdot\text{s} \) - \( 1\,\text{eV} = 1.602 \times 10^{-19}\,\text{J} \) We are to **iteratively solve** for the allowed energies. --- ## 1. The Transcendental Equations For a symmetric well (\(-L/2 < x < L/2\)), the bound state energies are given by: Let \( E \) be the bound state energy (\( 0 < E < V_0 \)), and define: \[ k = \sqrt{\frac{2mE}{\hbar^2}} \] \[ \kappa = \sqrt{\frac{2m(V_0-E)}{\hbar^2}} \] The transcendental equations for even and odd states are: - **Even states** (ground state, etc.): \[ k \tan\left(\frac{kL}{2}\right) = \kappa \] - **Odd states** (first excited, etc.): \[ -k \cot\left(\frac{kL}{2}\right) = \kappa \] --- ## 2. Dimensionless Form Define: \[ z = \frac{kL}{2}, \qquad z_0 = \frac{L}{2} \sqrt{\frac{2mV_0}{\hbar^2}} \] Then, \[ \kappa = \sqrt{\frac{2m(V_0-E)}{\hbar^2}} = \sqrt{\frac{2mV_0}{\hbar^2} - \frac{2mE}{\hbar^2}} = \frac{2}{L} \sqrt{z_0^2 - z^2} \] So: - **Even**: \(\tan z = \frac{\sqrt{z_0^2 - z^2}}{z} \) - **Odd**: \(-\cot z = \frac{\sqrt{z_0^2 - z^2}}{z} \) --- ## 3. Calculate \(z_0\): First, calculate \(z_0\): \[ z_0 = \frac{L}{2} \sqrt{\frac{2mV_0}{\hbar^2}} \] Plug in values: - \(L/2 = 0.25 \times 10^{-9}\,\text{m}\) - \(2m = 2 \times 9.11 \times 10^{-31} = 1.822 \times 10^{-30}\) - \(V_0 = 5.0\,\text{eV} = 8.01 \times 10^{-19}\,\text{J}\) - \(\hbar^2 = (1.055 \times 10^{-34})^2 = 1.113 \times 10^{-68}\) Calculate the inside of the square root: \[ \frac{2mV_0}{\hbar^2} = \frac{1.822 \times 10^{-30} \times 8.01 \times 10^{-19}}{1.113 \times 10^{-68}} = \frac{1.459 \times 10^{-48}}{1.113 \times 10^{-68}} = 1.311 \times 10^{20} \] Therefore, \[ z_0 = 0.25 \times 10^{-9} \times \sqrt{1.311 \times 10^{20}} = 0.25 \times 10^{-9} \times 1.145 \times 10^{10} = 2.86 \] --- ## 4. **Find the allowed \( z \) values (iterative approach)** The allowed \(z\) values are solutions to: - Even: \( \tan z = \frac{\sqrt{z_0^2 - z^2}}{z} \) - Odd: \( -\cot z = \frac{\sqrt{z_0^2 - z^2}}{z} \) But \(z\) must be less than \(z_0 = 2.86\). ### a) **Ground state (even solution):** We look for a solution between \(z = 0\) and \(z = \pi/2 \approx 1.57\). Set up the function: \[ f(z) = \tan z - \frac{\sqrt{z_0^2 - z^2}}{z} \] We seek \(f(z) = 0\). Let's try some values numerically: #### Try \( z = 1.0 \): \[ \frac{\sqrt{2.86^2 - 1.0^2}}{1.0} = \frac{\sqrt{8.18 - 1.0}}{1.0} = \frac{\sqrt{7.18}}{1.0} \approx 2.68 \] \(\tan(1.0) = 1.557\) So \(f(1.0) = 1.557 - 2.68 = -1.123\) #### Try \( z = 1.3 \): \[ \sqrt{2.86^2 - 1.69} = \sqrt{8.18 - 1.69} = \sqrt{6.49} = 2.55 \] \(2.55 / 1.3 = 1.96\) \(\tan(1.3) = 3.602\) So \(f(1.3) = 3.602 - 1.96 = 1.64\) So between \(z = 1.0\) (f = -1.12) and \(1.3\) (f = +1.64), the function crosses zero. #### Try \( z = 1.15 \): \[ \sqrt{8.18 - 1.3225} = \sqrt{6.8575} = 2.62 \] \(2.62 / 1.15 = 2.28\) \(\tan(1.15) = 2.1445\) \(f(1.15) = 2.1445 - 2.28 = -0.135\) #### Try \( z = 1.2 \): \[ \sqrt{8.18 - 1.44} = \sqrt{6.74} = 2.60 \] \(2.60 / 1.2 = 2.17\) \(\tan(1.2) = 2.5721\) \(f(1.2) = 2.5721 - 2.17 = 0.40\) So at \(z = 1.15\), \(f = -0.135\); at \(z = 1.2\), \(f = 0.40\). Interpolate: \[ z_1 \approx 1.15 + \frac{0.135}{0.135+0.40} \times (1.2 - 1.15) = 1.15 + \frac{0.135}{0.535} \times 0.05 \approx 1.15 + 0.013 = 1.163 \] Let’s check at \(z = 1.17\): \[ \sqrt{8.18 - 1.3689} = \sqrt{6.8111} = 2.61 \] \(2.61/1.17 = 2.23\) \(\tan(1.17) = 2.302\) \(f(1.17) = 2.302 - 2.23 = 0.072\) Now at \(z=1.15\): \(f=-0.135\), \(z=1.17\): \(f=0.072\). So zero crossing is at \[ z = 1.15 + \frac{0.135}{0.135+0.072} \times (1.17-1.15) \approx 1.15 + \frac{0.135}{0.207} \times 0.02 \approx 1.15 + 0.013 = 1.163 \] **So, the ground state solution is at \( z_1 \approx 1.16 \) (to three sig. figs).** --- ### b) **First excited state (odd solution):** Odd solution: \( -\cot z = \frac{\sqrt{z_0^2 - z^2}}{z} \) So, \( f(z) = -\cot z - \frac{\sqrt{z_0^2 - z^2}}{z} \) Odd solutions are between \(z = \pi/2\) and \(z_0\): - \(\pi/2 \approx 1.57\) - \(z_0 = 2.86\) Let’s try \(z = 2.0\): \[ \sqrt{8.18 - 4.0} = \sqrt{4.18} = 2.04 \] \(2.04 / 2.0 = 1.02\) \(-\cot(2.0) = -1/\tan(2.0) = -1/(-2.185) = 0.457\) \(f(2.0) = 0.457 - 1.02 = -0.563\) Try \(z = 2.4\): \[ \sqrt{8.18 - 5.76} = \sqrt{2.42} = 1.56 \] \(1.56 / 2.4 = 0.65\) \(\tan(2.4) = -0.883\), \(-\cot(2.4) = -1/(-0.883) = 1.13\) \(f(2.4) = 1.13 - 0.65 = 0.48\) So, at \(z=2.0\), \(f=-0.563\); at \(z=2.4\), \(f=0.48\). Try \(z=2.2\): \[ \sqrt{8.18 - 4.84} = \sqrt{3.34} = 1.83 \] \(1.83/2.2=0.83\) \(\tan(2.2) = -1.370\), \(-\cot(2.2) = -1/(-1.37)=0.73\) \(f(2.2) = 0.73 - 0.83 = -0.10\) Try \(z=2.3\): \[ \sqrt{8.18 - 5.29} = \sqrt{2.89} = 1.70 \] \(1.70/2.3 = 0.739\) \(\tan(2.3) = -1.342\), \(-\cot(2.3) = -1/(-1.342) = 0.745\) \(f(2.3) = 0.745 - 0.739 = 0.006 \] Very close to zero! Let's check at \(z=2.28\): \[ \sqrt{8.18 - 5.1984} = \sqrt{2.9816} = 1.727 \] \(1.727/2.28=0.758\) \(\tan(2.28) = -1.381\), \(-\cot(2.28) = -1/(-1.381) = 0.724\) \(f(2.28) = 0.724 - 0.758 = -0.034\) So, at \(z=2.28\), \(f=-0.034\); at \(z=2.3\), \(f=0.006\). So crossing is at \[ z_2 = 2.28 + \frac{0.034}{0.034+0.006} \times (2.3-2.28) = 2.28 + \frac{0.034}{0.04} \times 0.02 = 2.28 + 0.017 = 2.297 \] So, to three significant figures, \(z_2 = 2.30\). --- ## 5. **Convert \(z\) to Energy** Recall: \[ z = \frac{kL}{2} = \frac{L}{2} \sqrt{\frac{2mE}{\hbar^2}} \] So, \[ E = \frac{\hbar^2 k^2}{2m} = \frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \left(\frac{2z}{L}\right)^2 = \frac{2\hbar^2 z^2}{mL^2} \] Plug in numbers: - \(\hbar^2 = 1.113 \times 10^{-68}\) - \(m = 9.11 \times

Question:

wrong

This is AI generated Response.
Asked by: Adapaka Jagadeesh
Created at: 2025-07-29 14:48:57

Final Answer:

Rendered Raw Text
Did you like this answer?
Let's carefully compute the energies of the ground and first excited states of an electron in a finite potential well of width 0.5 nm and height 5.0 eV using an iterative approach. --- ### Step 1: Convert known quantities to SI units - Well width: \(L = 0.5\,\text{nm} = 0.5 \times 10^{-9}\,\text{m}\) - Well depth: \(V_0 = 5.0\,\text{eV} = 5.0 \times 1.602 \times 10^{-19}\,\text{J} = 8.01 \times 10^{-19}\,\text{J}\) - Electron mass: \(m = 9.11 \times 10^{-31}\,\text{kg}\) - Reduced Planck's constant: \(\hbar = 1.055 \times 10^{-34}\,\text{Js}\) --- ### Step 2: Calculate the parameter \(z_0\) The transcendental equations are best handled in dimensionless form. Define: \[ z_0 = \frac{L}{2} \sqrt{\frac{2mV_0}{\hbar^2}} \] Compute: \[ \frac{2mV_0}{\hbar^2} = \frac{2 \times 9.11 \times 10^{-31} \times 8.01 \times 10^{-19}}{(1.055 \times 10^{-34})^2} \] Calculate numerator: \[ 2 \times 9.11 \times 10^{-31} \times 8.01 \times 10^{-19} \approx 1.459 \times 10^{-48} \] Calculate denominator: \[ (1.055 \times 10^{-34})^2 \approx 1.113 \times 10^{-68} \] Thus: \[ \frac{2mV_0}{\hbar^2} \approx \frac{1.459 \times 10^{-48}}{1.113 \times 10^{-68}} \approx 1.311 \times 10^{20} \] Now: \[ z_0 = \frac{0.5 \times 10^{-9}}{2} \times \sqrt{1.311 \times 10^{20}} = 0.25 \times 10^{-9} \times 1.145 \times 10^{10} \approx 2.86 \] --- ### Step 3: Find the allowed \(z\) values The solutions satisfy: - **Even states:** \[ \tan z = \frac{\sqrt{z_0^2 - z^2}}{z} \] - **Odd states:** \[ -\cot z = \frac{\sqrt{z_0^2 - z^2}}{z} \] with \(z < z_0 \approx 2.86\). --- ### Step 4: Find the ground state energy (even solution) Estimate \(z\) for the ground state: - The first solution occurs between \(z=0\) and \(\pi/2 \approx 1.57\). Let's iterate: **At \(z=0.5\):** \[ \sqrt{2.86^2 - 0.5^2} = \sqrt{8.18 - 0.25} = \sqrt{7.93} \approx 2.82 \] \[ \frac{\sqrt{z_0^2 - z^2}}{z} \approx \frac{2.82}{0.5} = 5.64 \] \[ \tan(0.5) \approx 0.546 \] Since \(0.546 < 5.64\), the RHS is larger; increase \(z\). **At \(z=1.0\):** \[ \sqrt{8.18 - 1} = \sqrt{7.18} \approx 2.68 \] \[ 2.68/1.0 = 2.68 \] \[ \tan(1.0) \approx 1.557 \] Since \(1.557 < 2.68\), increase \(z\). **At \(z=1.2\):** \[ \sqrt{8.18 - 1.44} = \sqrt{6.74} \approx 2.6 \] \[ 2.6/1.2 \approx 2.17 \] \[ \tan(1.2) \approx 2.572 \] Since \(2.572 > 2.17\), the LHS exceeds RHS; decrease \(z\). Between 1.0 and 1.2, at \(z=1.1\): \[ \sqrt{8.18 - 1.21} = \sqrt{6.97} \approx 2.64 \] \[ 2.64/1.1 \approx 2.4 \] \(\tan(1.1) \approx 1.964\) Since \(1.964 < 2.4\), increase \(z\). At \(z=1.15\): \[ \sqrt{8.18 - 1.3225} = \sqrt{6.8575} \approx 2.62 \] \[ 2.62/1.15 \approx 2.28 \] \(\tan(1.15) \approx 2.1445\) Since \(2.1445 < 2.28\), increase \(z\). At \(z=1.17\): \[ \sqrt{8.18 - 1.3689} = \sqrt{6.8111} \approx 2.61 \] \[ 2.61/1.17 \approx 2.23 \] \(\tan(1.17) \approx 2.572\) Now, \(\tan z \approx 2.572\) and RHS \(\approx 2.23\). The LHS exceeds RHS, so solution near \(z \approx 1.16\). **Interpolating:** Between 1.15 and 1.17, the solution is approximately **\(z \approx 1.16\)**. --- ### Step 5: Calculate the ground state energy \[ E_1 = \frac{\hbar^2 k^2}{2m} \] where \[ k = \frac{2z}{L} \] So: \[ E_1 = \frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \left(\frac{2z}{L}\right)^2 = \frac{4 \hbar^2 z^2}{2 m L^2} = \frac{2 \hbar^2 z^2}{m L^2} \] Plug in: \[ \frac{2 \times (1.055 \times 10^{-34})^2 \times (1.16)^2}{9.11 \times 10^{-31} \times (0.5 \times 10^{-9})^2} \] Calculate numerator: \[ 2 \times 1.113 \times 10^{-68} \times 1.3456 \approx 2.996 \times 10^{-68} \] Calculate denominator: \[ 9.11 \times 10^{-31} \times 0.25 \times 10^{-18} = 2.278 \times 10^{-49} \] Thus: \[ E_1 \approx \frac{2.996 \times 10^{-68}}{2.278 \times 10^{-49}} \approx 1.315 \times 10^{-19}\,\text{J} \] Convert to eV: \[ E_1 = \frac{1.315 \times 10^{-19}}{1.602 \times 10^{-19}} \approx 0.82\,\text{eV} \] ### **Ground state energy: \(\boxed{0.82\,\text{eV}}\)** --- ### **Step 6: Find the first excited state (odd solution)** Using similar procedure: Solutions occur between \(\pi/2 \approx 1.57\) and \(z_0=2.86\). Test at \(z=2.3\): \[ \sqrt{8.18 - 2.3^2} = \sqrt{8.18 - 5.29} = \sqrt{2.89} \approx 1.70 \] \[ \frac{1.70}{2.3} \approx 0.739 \] \[ -\cot(2.3) \approx -(-1/ \tan 2.3) \approx -(-1/(-1.370)) \approx -0.730 \] Calculate \(f(z)\): \[ f(2.3) = -\cot z - \frac{\sqrt{z_0^2 - z^2}}{z} \approx 0.730 - 0.739 = -0.009 \] At \(z = 2.31\): \[ \sqrt{8.18 - 2.34^2} = \sqrt{8.18 - 5.48} = \sqrt{2.70} \approx 1.64 \] \[ 1.64/2.31 \approx 0.71 \] \(\tan 2.31 \approx -1.305\), so: \[ -\cot 2.31 = -(-1/ -1.305) \approx -0.766 \] \(f(2.31) = 0.766 - 0.71 = 0.056\) Zero crossing between \(z=2.3\) and 2.31. Interpolating: \[ z \approx 2.30 + \frac{0.009}{0.009 + 0.056} \times 0.01 \approx 2.30 + 0.0015 = 2.3015 \] Thus, \(z \approx 2.30\) (to three sig. figs). --- ### Step 7: Calculate the excited state energy \[ E_2 = \frac{2 \hbar^2 z^2}{m L^2} \] Using \(z=2.30\): \[ E_2 \approx \frac{2 \times 1.113 \times 10^{-68} \times (2.30)^2}{9.11 \times 10^{-31} \times (0.5 \times 10^{-9})^2} \] Numerator: \[ 2 \times 1.113 \times 10^{-68} \times 5.29 \approx 11.77 \times 10^{-68} \] Denominator: \[ 9.11 \times 10^{-31} \times 0.25 \times 10^{-18} = 2.278 \times 10^{-49} \] Calculate: \[ E_2 \approx \frac{11.77 \times 10^{-68}}{2.278 \times 10^{-49}} \approx 5.17 \times 10^{-19}\,\text{J} \] Convert to eV: \[ E_2 \approx \frac{5.17 \times 10^{-19}}{1.602 \times 10^{-19}} \approx 3.23\,\text{eV} \] --- ### **Final Results:** | State | Energy (eV) | |---------|--------------| | Ground state | **0.82 eV** | | First excited state | **3.23 eV** | --- ### **Answer:** **The approximate energies are:** \[ \boxed{ \begin{aligned} E_1 &\approx \boxed{0.82\,\text{eV}} \quad \text{(ground state)} \\ E_2 &\approx \boxed{3.23\,\text{eV}} \quad \text{(first excited state)} \\ \end{aligned} } \] These are consistent with the iterative solutions and typical finite well behavior.

📢 Instructions:

  • Ask anything relatd to above question only.
  • For new Question goto :

Study Help, Fast Answers

VIPSolutions focuses on clear, step‑by‑step explanations so you can learn quickly. Whether you need an AI‑generated walkthrough or a short hint to get unstuck, each solution is organized for fast reading and easy review later.

Search similar questions, compare approaches, and bookmark the best answers for revision. Our goal is simple: quick, reliable study help that feels natural—not noisy.