VIPSolutions logo ✨ VIPSolutions

Part A . ( 2 0 points ) An assembly plant purchases 2 0 , 0 0 0 air filters per year. Fixed order cost is $ 6 0 0 . The company uses an inventory holding cost rate of 0 . 4 per year. The vendor has offered the following price schedule: For the first 3 0 0 units, the unit purchase cost is $ 1 0 . Any additional units can be purchased at $ 5 per unit. For example, if you purchase 3 0 1 units, your total purchase cost will be $ 3 , 0 0 5 . What are the optimal order quantity and the corresponding optimal total cost per unit time?

Question:

Part A . ( 2 0 points ) An assembly plant purchases 2 0 , 0 0 0 air filters per year. Fixed order cost is $ 6 0 0 . The company uses an inventory holding cost rate of 0 . 4 per year. The vendor has offered the following price schedule: For the first 3 0 0 units, the unit purchase cost is $ 1 0 . Any additional units can be purchased at $ 5 per unit. For example, if you purchase 3 0 1 units, your total purchase cost will be $ 3 , 0 0 5 . What are the optimal order quantity and the corresponding optimal total cost per unit time?

This is AI generated Response.
Asked by: Veera manikanta
Created at: 2025-09-04 05:15:50

Final Answer:

Rendered Raw Text
Did you like this answer?
Let's break down the problem and solve for the **optimal order quantity** and **total annual cost**. ### **Known Data** - **Annual demand (\(D\))** = 20,000 air filters/year - **Fixed order cost (\(S\))** = \$600/order - **Inventory holding cost rate (\(h\))** = 0.4 per year (this is likely 40% of unit price per year) - **Price schedule:** - **First 300 units**: \$10/unit - **Additional units**: \$5/unit For an order of \( Q \) units: - If \( Q \leq 300 \): all units at \$10/unit. - If \( Q > 300 \): first 300 at \$10 each, rest at \$5 each. --- ## **Step 1: EOQ for Each Price Bracket** ### **Case 1: All units at \$10 (if order ≤ 300)** #### **EOQ Formula:** \[ EOQ = \sqrt{\frac{2DS}{hC}} \] Here, \( C \) is the unit cost. \[ EOQ_{10} = \sqrt{ \frac{2 \times 20000 \times 600}{0.4 \times 10} } = \sqrt{ \frac{24,000,000}{4} } = \sqrt{6,000,000} \approx 2449.49 \] But this number is **greater than 300**, so **Case 1 is not feasible** (for all units at \$10, Q must be ≤ 300). --- ### **Case 2: First 300 at \$10, rest at \$5 (if order > 300)** Average unit cost for \( Q > 300 \): \[ \text{Total purchase cost} = 300 \times 10 + (Q-300) \times 5 = 3000 + 5(Q-300) = 5Q + 1500 \] \[ \text{Average unit cost} = \frac{5Q + 1500}{Q} \] However, **holding cost per unit per year** is 40% of the unit price paid for each unit. For calculation, we use the marginal cost (\$5 per unit) for units beyond 300. But for EOQ calculation, we use the lower price bracket since the EOQ is above 300. So, for \( Q > 300 \), **unit cost for holding cost** is \$5. \[ EOQ_{5} = \sqrt{ \frac{2DS}{hC} } = \sqrt{ \frac{2 \times 20000 \times 600}{0.4 \times 5} } = \sqrt{ \frac{24,000,000}{2} } = \sqrt{12,000,000} \approx 3464.1 \] This is > 300, so in this bracket, EOQ is feasible. --- ## **Step 2: Calculate Total Annual Cost at EOQ** Total annual cost = Purchasing + Ordering + Holding Where: - **Purchasing cost/year** = \( D \times \) **Average Unit Cost** - **Ordering cost/year** = \( \frac{D}{Q} \times S \) - **Holding cost/year** = Average inventory \(\times\) holding cost per unit per year ### **Case A: Order Q = 300 (all at \$10/unit)** \[ \text{Purchasing cost} = 20,000 \times 10 = \$200,000 \] \[ \text{Ordering cost} = \frac{20,000}{300} \times 600 \approx 66.67 \times 600 = \$40,000 \] \[ \text{Average inventory} = 300 / 2 = 150 \] \[ \text{Holding cost per unit} = 0.4 \times 10 = \$4 \] \[ \text{Holding cost} = 150 \times 4 = \$600 \] \[ \text{Total annual cost} = 200,000 + 40,000 + 600 = \$240,600 \] --- ### **Case B: Order Q = EOQ = 3464 (first 300 at \$10, rest at \$5)** - **Purchase cost per order**: \( 300 \times 10 + (Q-300) \times 5 \) - **Average unit cost:** \( \frac{3000 + (Q-300)\times5}{Q} \) \[ \text{Average unit cost} = \frac{3000 + (3464-300)\times5}{3464} = \frac{3000 + 3164 \times 5}{3464} = \frac{3000 + 15820}{3464} = \frac{18820}{3464} \approx 5.43 \] \[ \text{Purchasing cost per year} = 20,000 \times 5.43 = \$108,600 \] \[ \text{Ordering cost} = \frac{20,000}{3464} \times 600 \approx 5.77 \times 600 = \$3,462 \] \[ \text{Average inventory} = 3464 / 2 = 1732 \] \[ \text{Holding cost per unit} = 0.4 \times 5 = \$2 \] \[ \text{Holding cost} = 1732 \times 2 = \$3,464 \] \[ \text{Total annual cost} = 108,600 + 3,462 + 3,464 = \$115,526 \] --- ### **Step 3: Check at Order Quantity Just Above 300 (Q = 301)** \[ \text{Purchase cost per order} = 300 \times 10 + 1 \times 5 = 3000 + 5 = 3005 \] \[ \text{Average unit cost} = \frac{3005}{301} \approx 9.99 \] \[ \text{Purchasing cost per year} = 20,000 \times 9.99 = \$199,800 \] \[ \text{Ordering cost} = \frac{20,000}{301} \times 600 \approx 66.45 \times 600 = \$39,870 \] \[ \text{Average inventory} = 301/2 = 150.5 \] \[ \text{Holding cost per unit} = 0.4 \times 5 = \$2 \] \[ \text{Holding cost} = 150.5 \times 2 = \$301 \] \[ \text{Total cost} = 199,800 + 39,870 + 301 = \$240,000 \] --- ## **Conclusion** - **Order Q = 300 (all at \$10):** \$240,600/year - **Order Q = 301 (first 300 at \$10, 1 at \$5):** \$240,000/year - **Order Q = 3464 (EOQ, mostly at \$5):** \$115,526/year ### **Optimal Order Quantity and Cost** - **Optimal Order Quantity \(Q^*\) = 3,464** - **Optimal Total Cost per Year** = **\$115,526** --- ## **Final Answers** ### **Optimal order quantity:** \[ \boxed{3,464} \] ### **Corresponding optimal total cost per year:** \[ \boxed{\$115,526} \] --- **If you need the answer expressed as cost per unit time (per year), it is \$115,526.**

📢 Instructions:

  • Ask anything relatd to above question only.
  • For new Question goto :

Study Help, Fast Answers

VIPSolutions focuses on clear, step‑by‑step explanations so you can learn quickly. Whether you need an AI‑generated walkthrough or a short hint to get unstuck, each solution is organized for fast reading and easy review later.

Search similar questions, compare approaches, and bookmark the best answers for revision. Our goal is simple: quick, reliable study help that feels natural—not noisy.