LL 905s §3 £528 3: Ha seis ff gre 3% §iis 23 s 2% 52 3 f@ 32 3 ii i ¢ 3k 5g iH i H § H i
Question:
LL
905s §3
£528 3:
Ha
seis ff
gre 3%
§iis 23
s 2% 52
3 f@ 32
3 ii i
¢ 3k 5g
iH
i
H
§
H
i
This is AI generated Response.
Asked by: Vinay
Created at: 2025-12-12 20:12:22
Asked by: Vinay
Created at: 2025-12-12 20:12:22
Thought Process:
Rendered
Raw Text
**Analyzing financial policies**
I need to analyze the question in the image concerning financial policies. It asks which of the following a flexible short-term financial policy will tend to have more of compared to a restrictive one: uncollectable accounts receivable, work stoppages, carrying costs, or obsolescence of inventory.
In working capital management, a flexible policy results in larger investments in current assets and lenient credit terms. This approach likely leads to higher carrying costs due to more current assets and possibly increased obsolescence and uncollectible accounts.**Evaluating flexible credit policy**
Under a flexible credit policy, extending credit to more customers can increase accounts receivable and default risk, leading to potentially more uncollectible accounts. The question asks what a flexible policy will have more of compared to a restrictive policy.
1. Work stoppages for lack of raw materials would likely decrease due to carrying more inventory, so that won't be included.
2. Higher carrying costs are associated with more current assets, so that item is included.
3. Obsolescence of inventory also increases as larger inventories may lead to slower turnover. So, that’s another item included.**Analyzing uncollectable accounts**
Item 4 is included in my evaluation. With a lenient credit policy, uncollectible accounts may indeed increase. A flexible policy often results in larger accounts receivable with less strict collection efforts, raising the possibility of bad debts. So, items 1 (uncollectable accounts), 3 (carrying costs), and 4 (obsolescence) are likely increased under a flexible policy.
I think the answer might point to "1, 3, and 4." A flexible financial policy leans toward high investments in current assets and liberal credit terms, resulting in both higher carrying costs and specific credit-related costs, like uncollectable accounts.**Clarifying accounts receivable costs**
Uncollectible accounts are usually linked to liberal credit policies, but I’m wondering if they actually fall under "shortage costs." Shortage costs typically occur when current assets are low, leading to stockouts and lost sales. A flexible policy reduces these shortage costs while increasing carrying costs. However, uncollectible accounts don’t fit the shortage cost definition; they appear with liberal credit terms. Therefore, a flexible policy likely results in more uncollectibles.
Regarding the exam question, potential choices could include combinations of uncollectible accounts, work stoppages, carrying costs, and inventory obsolescence.**Compiling final answer explanation**
So, the answers are items 1, 3, and 4. I want to provide a brief explanation in a clear format without heavy formatting. Here’s what I'll craft:
- A flexible policy involves a large investment in cash, inventory, and receivables, along with looser credit terms.
- This leads to higher carrying costs due to increased inventory and receivables, alongside greater risks of inventory obsolescence and higher bad-debt losses from lenient credit.
- Additionally, it reduces costs related to shortages, such as work stoppages. Thus, the answer comprises items 1, 3, and 4.
Final Answer:
Rendered
Raw Text
Did you like this answer?
Answer: 1, 3, and 4.
Reason:
- A flexible short‑term policy holds more current assets and offers looser credit. That increases carrying costs (3), raises bad‑debt losses/uncollectible A/R (1), and increases the risk of inventory obsolescence (4).
- It decreases shortage costs, so work stoppages for lack of raw materials (2) would be less likely, not more.
📢 Instructions:
- Ask anything relatd to above question only.
- For new Question goto :
VIPSolutions