VIPSolutions logo ✨ VIPSolutions

Give step-by-step solution with explanation and final answer:2. (i) Consider two identical particles in a 3D spherical potential. The spin wave [2 function of the system is anti-symmetric. The position space wave function ¢(ry, 12) is anti-symmetric as well. What does this mean for ¢(r;, r2)? What can be said about the spin of the identical particles? (ii) Consider a particle of mass m in a one-dimensional potential 0 (x

Question:

Give step-by-step solution with explanation and final answer:Uploaded Image2. (i) Consider two identical particles in a 3D spherical potential. The spin wave [2 function of the system is anti-symmetric. The position space wave function ¢(ry, 12) is anti-symmetric as well. What does this mean for ¢(r;, r2)? What can be said about the spin of the identical particles? (ii) Consider a particle of mass m in a one-dimensional potential 0 (x

This is AI generated Response.
Asked by: gvr
Created at: 2025-07-24 03:59:09

Final Answer:

Rendered Raw Text
Did you like this answer?
Let's solve each part step by step: --- ### (i) Identical Particles and Symmetry #### **What does this mean for \(\phi(\mathbf{r}_1, \mathbf{r}_2)\)?** - The total wave function for two identical fermions must be **anti-symmetric** under particle exchange due to the Pauli exclusion principle. - The total state = spin part × spatial part. - Given: Spin wave function is **anti-symmetric** (i.e., singlet state). - Therefore, the **spatial wave function must also be anti-symmetric**: \[ \phi(\mathbf{r}_1, \mathbf{r}_2) = -\phi(\mathbf{r}_2, \mathbf{r}_1) \] #### **What can be said about the spin of the identical particles?** - The spin wave function is anti-symmetric (singlet state). - For two spin-1/2 particles, this means the total spin \( S = 0 \). - **Thus, the system is in a singlet state** (anti-parallel spins, total spin 0). --- ## (ii) One-dimensional Potential ### **a) Sketch the potential** \[ V(x) = \begin{cases} 0 & (x \leq 0) \\ -2V_a & (0 < x \leq a) \\ V_a & (a < x \leq 3a) \\ 0 & (x > 3a) \end{cases} \] - At \(x = 0\): jumps from 0 to \(-2V_a\) - At \(x = a\): jumps from \(-2V_a\) to \(V_a\) - At \(x = 3a\): jumps from \(V_a\) back to 0 *Sketch:* - Draw x-axis. - From \(x \leq 0\), \(V(x) = 0\). - From \(0 < x \leq a\), \(V(x) = -2V_a\) (below x-axis). - From \(a < x \leq 3a\), \(V(x) = V_a\) (above x-axis). - From \(x > 3a\), \(V(x) = 0\). --- ### **b) For which energies do you expect bound state and scattering solutions?** - **Bound states:** The energy \(E\) must be less than the value of the potential at infinity (here, 0). So, **bound states exist for \(E < 0\)**. - **Scattering states:** The energy is above the asymptotic potential, so **scattering states occur for \(E > 0\)**. --- ### **c) Solve the Schrödinger equation for \(0 < E < V_a\), particle coming from the right** #### **Regions:** 1. \(x \leq 0\): \(V=0\) 2. \(0 < x \leq a\): \(V=-2V_a\) 3. \(a < x \leq 3a\): \(V=V_a\) 4. \(x > 3a\): \(V=0\) #### **Wave numbers:** Let \(k = \sqrt{2mE}/\hbar\), \(k_1 = \sqrt{2m(E+2V_a)}/\hbar\), \(\kappa = \sqrt{2m(V_a-E)}/\hbar\). #### **Wavefunctions:** 1. \(x \leq 0\): \(V=0\) \[ \psi_1(x) = Ae^{-ikx} + Be^{ikx} \] 2. \(0 < x \leq a\): \(V = -2V_a\) \[ \psi_2(x) = C e^{-ik_1 x} + D e^{ik_1 x} \] 3. \(a < x \leq 3a\): \(V = V_a\) \[ \psi_3(x) = F e^{\kappa x} + G e^{-\kappa x} \] 4. \(x > 3a\): \(V=0\) \[ \psi_4(x) = H e^{ikx} \] (Assume a beam comes from the right, so only transmitted wave to the right.) #### **Integration constants:** There are 8 constants: \(A, B, C, D, F, G, H\). #### **Boundary conditions:** At each interface (\(x = 0, a, 3a\)), both \(\psi\) and \(d\psi/dx\) must be continuous. - 3 boundaries × 2 conditions each = 6 equations. Thus, **2 integration constants will remain undetermined** (typically related to the normalization of the incoming wave). --- ### **d) Reflection and transmission probabilities** - **Reflection probability:** \(R = \left| \frac{A}{H} \right|^2\) - **Transmission probability:** \(T = \left| \frac{H}{A} \right|^2\) (Assuming \(A\) is the amplitude of the incident wave, and \(H\) is the amplitude of the transmitted wave.) --- ## (iii) Particle in one-dimensional finite potential well ### **a) Solve the stationary Schrödinger equation for bound states** \[ V(x) = \begin{cases} \infty & (x \leq 0) \\ 0 & (0 < x \leq L) \\ V_c & (x > L) \end{cases} \] #### **Regions:** 1. \(x \leq 0\): \(\psi = 0\) 2. \(0 < x < L\): \(V = 0\) \[ \psi_1(x) = A \sin(kx) \] where \(k = \sqrt{2mE}/\hbar\) 3. \(x > L\): \(V = V_c\) \[ \psi_2(x) = B e^{-\kappa(x-L)} \] where \(\kappa = \sqrt{2m(V_c - E)}/\hbar\) #### **Boundary conditions:** - At \(x = 0\): \(\psi(0) = 0 \implies\) already satisfied. - At \(x = L\): Continuity of \(\psi\) and \(d\psi/dx\): \[ A \sin(kL) = B \] \[ A k \cos(kL) = -B \kappa \] Divide the second equation by the first: \[ k \cot(kL) = -\kappa \] This is the **transcendental equation for the bound state energies**. --- ### **b) Requirement on \(V_c\) to have at least one bound state** - At least one bound state exists if the well is deep enough. - The lowest energy bound state occurs when \(kL \to 0\), so the requirement is: \[ V_c > \frac{\pi^2 \hbar^2}{2m L^2} \] (This is the minimum potential required for at least one solution to the transcendental equation.) --- ## **Summary of Final Answers** --- **(i)** - \(\phi(\mathbf{r}_1, \mathbf{r}_2) = -\phi(\mathbf{r}_2, \mathbf{r}_1)\) - The particles are in a singlet state, total spin \(S=0\). **(ii)** - (a) Sketch as described above. - (b) Bound states: \(E < 0\), Scattering states: \(E > 0\). - (c) Write general solutions in each region, match at boundaries; 2 constants remain undetermined. - (d) \(R = |A/H|^2\), \(T = |H/A|^2\). **(iii)** - (a) Solutions: \(\psi(x) = A\sin(kx)\) for \(0<x<L\), \(\psi(x) = B e^{-\kappa(x-L)}\) for \(x>L\); energy given by \(k\cot(kL) = -\kappa\). - (b) Condition: \(V_c > \frac{\pi^2 \hbar^2}{2m L^2}\).

Question:

i need step by step detailed calculations of each part along with the final answer

This is AI generated Response.
Asked by: gvr
Created at: 2025-07-24 04:01:55

Final Answer:

Rendered Raw Text
Did you like this answer?
Certainly! Let's go through each part carefully, step by step, with detailed explanations and calculations. --- ## **(i) Symmetry of the two-particle wavefunction** ### Given: - Two identical particles in a 3D spherical potential. - The spin wave function is **antisymmetric**. - The position space wave function \(\phi(\mathbf{r}_1, \mathbf{r}_2)\) is **antisymmetric**. --- ### **What does this imply for \(\phi(\mathbf{r}_1, \mathbf{r}_2)\)?** **Step 1:** Recall the total wavefunction for two identical particles is a product of spin and spatial parts: \[ \Psi_{\text{total}} = \text{(spin part)} \times \text{(spatial part)}. \] **Step 2:** For **fermions** (like electrons), the total wavefunction must be **antisymmetric** under exchange: \[ \Psi_{\text{total}}(\mathbf{r}_1, \mathbf{r}_2) = - \Psi_{\text{total}}(\mathbf{r}_2, \mathbf{r}_1). \] **Step 3:** Given: - The **spin wave function is antisymmetric** (singlet state), so: \[ \text{spin part} = \chi_{\text{antisym}}. \] - The **spatial wave function** \(\phi(\mathbf{r}_1, \mathbf{r}_2)\) is **also antisymmetric**. **Step 4:** Since the total wavefunction is a product: \[ \Psi_{\text{total}} = \phi(\mathbf{r}_1, \mathbf{r}_2) \times \chi_{\text{antisym}}, \] and both are antisymmetric, their product is **symmetric**: \[ \text{antisymmetric} \times \text{antisymmetric} = \text{symmetric}. \] But **this contradicts** the requirement that the total wavefunction for fermions must be antisymmetric. **Step 5:** **Therefore**, the initial assumption that the spatial wavefunction is antisymmetric **must be** for the **spin-symmetric case**. Since the spin wavefunction is antisymmetric, the spatial part must be **symmetric** to ensure the total wavefunction is antisymmetric: \[ \phi(\mathbf{r}_1, \mathbf{r}_2) = + \phi(\mathbf{r}_2, \mathbf{r}_1). \] --- ### **Summary:** - Because the spin wavefunction is **antisymmetric**, the **spatial wavefunction must be symmetric** to produce an overall antisymmetric total wavefunction. --- ### **What can be said about the spin of the particles?** - The **spin wavefunction is antisymmetric**, indicating the particles are in the **singlet state**. - **Total spin \(S=0\)**. - **Particles are spin-1/2 fermions (electrons, protons, etc.)**. --- ## **(ii) One-dimensional potential** --- ### **a) Sketch of the potential \(V(x)\)** \[ V(x) = \begin{cases} 0 & x \leq 0 \\ -2V_a & 0 < x \leq a \\ V_a & a < x \leq 3a \\ 0 & x > 3a \end{cases} \] **Description:** - For \(x \leq 0\): potential is zero. - Between \(0\) and \(a\): potential dips to \(-2V_a\) (a well). - Between \(a\) and \(3a\): potential rises to \(V_a\). - Beyond \(3a\): potential returns to zero. *Graph:* Starting at zero, downward step to \(-2V_a\) in \([0,a]\), then upward to \(V_a\) in \([a, 3a]\), then back to zero. --- ### **b) Bound and scattering states** - **Bound states:** occur when the particle is confined in the potential well, i.e., energies **less than** the asymptotic potential at infinity (which is 0). - **Thus,** for \(E < 0\), the particle can be trapped, forming bound states. - **Scattering states:** occur when \(E > 0\), where the particle can escape to infinity. **Answer:** | Energy \(E\) | Type of solutions | |--------------|-------------------------| | \(E < 0\) | Bound states | | \(E > 0\) | Scattering states | --- ### **c) Solving the stationary Schrödinger equation \(E < V_a\)** Given: - The incoming beam comes from the right, with energy \(E\), where \(0 < E < V_a\). --- ### **Step 1:** Write the Schrödinger equation in each region: \[ -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{d^2 \psi}{dx^2} + V(x)\psi = E \psi. \] --- ### **Step 2:** Define wave numbers: \[ k = \frac{\sqrt{2mE}}{\hbar}, \quad k_1 = \frac{\sqrt{2m(E + 2V_a)}}{\hbar}, \quad \kappa = \frac{\sqrt{2m(V_a - E)}}{\hbar}. \] Note: - For \(V = 0\), the general solution is oscillatory with wave number \(k\). - For \(V = -2V_a\), the potential is negative, so the wave function oscillates with wave number \(k_1\). - For \(V = V_a\), potential is positive, leading to exponential decay or growth with \(\kappa\). --- ### **Step 3:** Write solutions in each region: 1. **Region I (\(x \leq 0\), \(V=0\)):** \[ \psi_1(x) = A e^{i k x} + B e^{-i k x}. \] (Incident wave moving from right to left, so for incoming from the right, the wave coming from the right is \(e^{-i k x}\).) But since the beam comes from the right, better to write: \[ \boxed{ \psi_1(x) = e^{-i k x} + R e^{i k x} } \] - Here, the incident wave is normalized to 1, \(e^{-i k x}\), traveling to the left. - \(R\) is the reflection amplitude. 2. **Region II (\(0 < x \leq a\), \(V=-2V_a\)):** \[ \psi_2(x) = C e^{i k_1 x} + D e^{-i k_1 x}. \] 3. **Region III (\(a < x \leq 3a\), \(V=V_a\)):** \[ \psi_3(x) = F e^{\kappa x} + G e^{-\kappa x}. \] Since \(E < V_a\), the solutions are exponential (decaying or growing). 4. **Region IV (\(x > 3a\), \(V=0\)):** \[ \psi_4(x) = T e^{i k x}. \] - \(T\) is the transmission amplitude to the right. --- ### **Summary of solutions:** \[ \boxed{ \begin{aligned} & \textbf{Region 1 (x \leq 0):} \quad \psi_1(x) = e^{-i k x} + R e^{i k x} \\ & \textbf{Region 2 (0 < x \leq a):} \quad \psi_2(x) = C e^{i k_1 x} + D e^{-i k_1 x} \\ & \textbf{Region 3 (a < x \leq 3a):} \quad \psi_3(x) = F e^{\kappa x} + G e^{-\kappa x} \\ & \textbf{Region 4 (x > 3a):} \quad \psi_4(x) = T e^{i k x} \end{aligned} } \] --- ### **Number of undetermined constants:** - Constants: \(R, C, D, F, G, T\)—a total of **6**. - Boundary conditions at \(x=0, a, 3a\) (continuity of wavefunction and derivative) give **6 equations**. - One of these constants (say, the incident amplitude normalized to 1) is fixed, so **5 constants** are determined. - **Two constants** (say, \(R\) and \(T\)) correspond to reflection and transmission coefficients, while the others are internal. **Answer:** - **Number of undetermined constants:** **2** (the incident amplitude set to 1, and the transmitted amplitude \(T\), which is related to transmission probability). --- ### **d) Reflection and transmission probabilities** - Reflection probability: \[ R_P = |R|^2, \] - Transmission probability: \[ T_P = \frac{\text{probability flux in transmitted wave}}{\text{incident flux}}. \] Since the incident wave is normalized to amplitude 1, and the wavefunctions are oscillatory in the free regions, the **probability flux**: \[ J = \frac{\hbar k}{m} |\text{amplitude}|^2. \] Thus, \[ \boxed{ \begin{aligned} R &= |R|^2, \\ T &= \frac{k}{k} |T|^2 = |T|^2, \end{aligned} } \] assuming equal fluxes in the incident and transmitted waves (since they have same wave number \(k\)). --- ## **(iii) Bound states in a finite potential well** Given: \[ V(x) = \begin{cases} \infty & x \leq 0, \\ 0 & 0 < x < L, \\ V_c & x \geq L, \end{cases} \] with \(V_c > 0\). --- ### **a) Solve for bound states** **Step 1:** The wavefunction must vanish at \(x=0\): \[ \psi(0) = 0. \] **Step 2:** In the well \((0 < x < L)\): \[ -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{d^2 \psi}{dx^2} = E \psi, \] with \(E < V_c\) (bound state), so: \[ k = \sqrt{\frac{2mE}{\hbar^2}}. \] Solution: \[ \psi_1(x) = A \sin(k x), \] since \(\psi(0)=0\) implies no cosine term. **Step 3:** Outside the well (\(x \geq L\)), the wavefunction decays exponentially: \[ \psi_2(x) = B e^{-\kappa (x - L)}, \] where \[ \kappa = \sqrt{\frac{2m(V_c - E)}{\hbar^2}}. \] **Step 4:** Boundary conditions at \(x=L\): - Continuity of \(\psi\): \[ A \sin(k L) = B, \] - Continuity of derivative: \[ A k \cos(k L) = - B \kappa, \] which yields: \[ A k \cos(k L) = - (A \sin(k L)) \kappa, \] divide both sides by \(A\): \[ k \cos(k L) = - \sin(k L) \kappa, \] or \[ k \cot(k L) = - \kappa. \] This is the **transcendental equation** for the bound state energies: \[ \boxed{ k \cot(k L) = - \sqrt{\frac{2m(V_c - E)}{\hbar^2}}. } \] Expressed explicitly in terms of \(E\): \[ k = \sqrt{\frac{2m E}{\hbar^2}}, \quad \kappa = \sqrt{\frac{2m(V_c - E)}{\hbar^2}}. \] --- ### **b) Condition on \(V_c\) for at least one bound state** - The lowest bound state corresponds approximately to the ground state of an infinite well: \[ E_1 \approx \frac{\pi^2 \hbar^2}{2m L^2}. \] - For this energy to be less than \(V_c\): \[ V_c > E_1 \implies V_c > \frac{\pi^2 \hbar^2}{2m L^2}. \] **Thus**, **the critical potential depth**: \[ \boxed{ V_c > \frac{\pi^2 \hbar^2}{2m L^2} } \] **must be satisfied for at least one bound state to exist.** --- # **Final Summary** | Part | Key Results | |---------|-------------------------| | (i) | Spatial wavefunction symmetric; particles are in spin singlet (\(S=0\)). | | (ii)a | Sketch as described: step potentials at specified points. | | (ii)b | Bound states for \(E<0\); scattering states for \(E>0\). | | (ii)c | Wavefunctions in each region with constants \(A,B,C,D,F,G,T\); 2 undetermined constants due to boundary conditions. | | (ii)d | Reflection probability \(R=|R|^2\), transmission

📢 Instructions:

  • Ask anything relatd to above question only.
  • For new Question goto :

Study Help, Fast Answers

VIPSolutions focuses on clear, step‑by‑step explanations so you can learn quickly. Whether you need an AI‑generated walkthrough or a short hint to get unstuck, each solution is organized for fast reading and easy review later.

Search similar questions, compare approaches, and bookmark the best answers for revision. Our goal is simple: quick, reliable study help that feels natural—not noisy.