VIPSolutions logo ✨ VIPSolutions

Give step-by-step solution with explanation and final answer: Nowadays it is very important to reduce one?s carbon footprint ( how much carbon we produce in our daily lifestyles ) . Minimizing the use of fossil fuels and instead resorting to renewable sources of energy ( eg . solar energy ) are vital to a sustainable lifestyle and a lower carbon footprint Let?s consider solar panels that prewarm the water fed to a conventional home water heater The solar panels have an installed cost of $ 3 0 0 0 and they reduce the homeowner?s energy bill by $ 3 0 per month The residual value of the solar panels is negligible at the end of their 1 0 - year life What is the annual effective IRR of this investment? The annual effective IRR of this investment is D % ( Round to two decimal places )

Question:

Give step-by-step solution with explanation and final answer: Nowadays it is very important to reduce one?s carbon footprint ( how much carbon we produce in our daily lifestyles ) . Minimizing the use of fossil fuels and instead resorting to renewable sources of energy ( eg . solar energy ) are vital to a sustainable lifestyle and a lower carbon footprint Let?s consider solar panels that prewarm the water fed to a conventional home water heater The solar panels have an installed cost of $ 3 0 0 0 and they reduce the homeowner?s energy bill by $ 3 0 per month The residual value of the solar panels is negligible at the end of their 1 0 - year life What is the annual effective IRR of this investment? The annual effective IRR of this investment is D % ( Round to two decimal places )

This is AI generated Response.
Asked by: Kota Swarupa Rani
Created at: 2025-07-17 22:38:05

Final Answer:

Rendered Raw Text
Did you like this answer?
Let's break down the problem and solve it step by step: ### **Given Data:** - **Initial cost of solar panels (\(C_0\)):** \$3,000 (outflow, at time 0) - **Monthly savings:** \$30 per month (inflow, for 10 years) - **Lifetime:** 10 years - **Residual value:** Negligible (so, zero) - **We need to find:** The **annual effective IRR** (Internal Rate of Return), rounded to two decimal places. --- ## **Step 1: Calculate the Cash Flows** - **Initial cash flow (time 0):** \(-\$3,000\) - **Monthly cash inflow:** \(+ \$30\) for each month, for 10 years (\(10 \times 12 = 120\) months). --- ## **Step 2: Convert Monthly Cash Flows to Annual Cash Flows** - **Annual savings:** \(30 \times 12 = \$360\) per year - **Total number of years:** 10 So, the cash flow stream is: - Year 0: \(-\$3,000\) - Year 1 to Year 10: \(+\$360\) each year --- ## **Step 3: Set Up the IRR Equation** The IRR is the rate \(r\) that makes the NPV zero: \[ -3,000 + 360 \times \left(\frac{1 - (1 + r)^{-10}}{r}\right) = 0 \] --- ## **Step 4: Solve for IRR** \[ 360 \times \left(\frac{1 - (1 + r)^{-10}}{r}\right) = 3,000 \] \[ \frac{1 - (1 + r)^{-10}}{r} = \frac{3,000}{360} = 8.3333 \] So, \[ 1 - (1 + r)^{-10} = 8.3333r \] \[ 1 - 8.3333r = (1 + r)^{-10} \] Take the reciprocal: \[ \frac{1}{1 - 8.3333r} = (1 + r)^{10} \] Now, take the 10th root: \[ 1 + r = \left(\frac{1}{1 - 8.3333r}\right)^{1/10} \] This equation is transcendental and must be solved numerically. --- ## **Step 5: Numerical Solution (Trial & Error or Use Financial Calculator or Excel)** Alternatively, let's estimate using trial and error: ### **Try \(r = 8\%\) (\(0.08\))** \[ (1 + 0.08)^{-10} = (1.08)^{-10} \approx 0.4632 \] \[ 1 - 0.4632 = 0.5368 \] \[ \text{NPV} = -3,000 + 360 \times \frac{0.5368}{0.08} = -3,000 + 360 \times 6.71 = -3,000 + 2,415.6 = -584.4 \] Still negative. Need a lower rate. ### **Try \(r = 5\%\) (\(0.05\))** \[ (1.05)^{-10} = 0.6139 \] \[ 1 - 0.6139 = 0.3861 \] \[ \text{NPV} = -3,000 + 360 \times \frac{0.3861}{0.05} = -3,000 + 360 \times 7.722 = -3,000 + 2,779.92 = -220.08 \] Still negative, but closer. ### **Try \(r = 3\%\) (\(0.03\))** \[ (1.03)^{-10} = 0.7441 \] \[ 1 - 0.7441 = 0.2559 \] \[ \frac{0.2559}{0.03} = 8.63 \] \[ 360 \times 8.63 = 3,106.8 \] \[ \text{NPV} = -3,000 + 3,106.8 = +106.8 \] Now positive! So IRR is between 3% and 5%. --- ## **Step 6: Interpolate** Let’s use linear interpolation between 3% and 5%: - At 3%: NPV = +106.8 - At 5%: NPV = -220.08 \[ \text{IRR} \approx 3\% + \frac{106.8}{106.8 + 220.08} \times (5\% - 3\%) = 3\% + \frac{106.8}{326.88} \times 2\% \] \[ \frac{106.8}{326.88} \approx 0.3266 \] \[ 0.3266 \times 2\% = 0.6532\% \] \[ \text{IRR} \approx 3\% + 0.65\% = 3.65\% \] --- ## **Step 7: Refine the Estimate** Let’s try \(r = 4\%\): \[ (1.04)^{-10} = 0.6756 \] \[ 1 - 0.6756 = 0.3244 \] \[ 0.3244 / 0.04 = 8.11 \] \[ 360 \times 8.11 = 2,919.6 \] \[ \text{NPV} = -3,000 + 2,919.6 = -80.4 \] Now between 3% (NPV = +106.8) and 4% (NPV = -80.4). \[ \text{IRR} = 3\% + \frac{106.8}{106.8 + 80.4} \times (4\% - 3\%) = 3\% + \frac{106.8}{187.2} \times 1\% \] \[ \frac{106.8}{187.2} = 0.571 \] \[ 0.571 \times 1\% = 0.571\% \] \[ \text{IRR} \approx 3.57\% \] --- ## **Step 8: Final Answer (Rounded to Two Decimal Places)** \[ \boxed{3.57\%} \] --- ## **Summary Table** | Rate | NPV | |------|----------| | 3% | +106.8 | | 4% | -80.4 | So the **annual effective IRR** of this investment is: \[ \boxed{3.57\%} \] --- ### **Explanation** - We set up the cash flows: \(-\$3,000\) at time 0, then \$360 per year for 10 years. - We used the IRR formula for an annuity and solved numerically. - By interpolating between 3% and 4%, we found that the IRR is approximately \(3.57\%\). --- **Final Answer:** **The annual effective IRR of this investment is** \(\boxed{3.57\%}\) **(rounded to two decimal places).**

📢 Instructions:

  • Ask anything relatd to above question only.
  • For new Question goto :

Study Help, Fast Answers

VIPSolutions focuses on clear, step‑by‑step explanations so you can learn quickly. Whether you need an AI‑generated walkthrough or a short hint to get unstuck, each solution is organized for fast reading and easy review later.

Search similar questions, compare approaches, and bookmark the best answers for revision. Our goal is simple: quick, reliable study help that feels natural—not noisy.