Give step-by-step solution with explanation and final answer:2. [20 pts.] An ideal gas of N distinguishable quantum particles (mass=m) is contained in a one-dimensional potential well given by Vie) = 0, O
Question:
Give step-by-step solution with explanation and final answer:
2. [20 pts.] An ideal gas of N distinguishable quantum particles (mass=m) is contained
in a one-dimensional potential well given by
Vie) = 0, O
This is AI generated Response.
Asked by: srrr
Created at: 2025-06-05 09:43:24
Asked by: srrr
Created at: 2025-06-05 09:43:24
Final Answer:
Rendered
Raw Text
Did you like this answer?
Let's solve each part step by step:
---
### **Given:**
- 1D infinite potential well: \( V(x) = 0 \) for \( 0 < x < L \), \( \infty \) otherwise.
- Energy levels: \( E_n = \epsilon n^2 \), where \( \epsilon = \frac{\hbar^2 \pi^2}{2mL^2} \), \( n = 1, 2, \ldots \)
- Only lowest two energy levels important (\( \epsilon \gg kT \)), so \( E_1 = \epsilon \), \( E_2 = 4\epsilon \).
---
## **Part (a): Partition function**
### **Single Particle Partition Function**
\[
z = \sum_{n=1}^{2} e^{-E_n / kT} = e^{-\epsilon / kT} + e^{-4\epsilon / kT}
\]
### **N Distinguishable Particles**
\[
Z = z^N = \left( e^{-\epsilon / kT} + e^{-4\epsilon / kT} \right)^N
\]
### **Logarithm of Z**
\[
\ln Z = N \ln \left( e^{-\epsilon / kT} + e^{-4\epsilon / kT} \right)
\]
Factor \( e^{-\epsilon / kT} \) out:
\[
= N \ln \left[ e^{-\epsilon / kT} \left( 1 + e^{-3\epsilon / kT} \right) \right]
\]
\[
= N \left[ -\frac{\epsilon}{kT} + \ln\left( 1 + e^{-3\epsilon / kT} \right) \right]
\]
When \( e^{-3\epsilon / kT} \ll 1 \) (since \( \epsilon \gg kT \)), use \( \ln(1+x) \approx x \):
\[
\ln Z \approx N \left( -\frac{\epsilon}{kT} + e^{-3\epsilon / kT} \right)
\]
---
### **Final answer for (a):**
\[
\boxed{
\ln Z = N \left( -\frac{\epsilon}{kT} + e^{-3\epsilon / kT} \right)
}
\]
---
## **Part (b): Internal energy near \( T = 0 \)**
Recall,
\[
U = -\frac{\partial}{\partial \beta} \ln Z, \quad \beta = \frac{1}{kT}
\]
From (a):
\[
\ln Z = N \left( -\epsilon \beta + e^{-3\epsilon \beta} \right)
\]
\[
U = -\frac{\partial}{\partial \beta} \ln Z = -N \left( -\epsilon + \frac{\partial}{\partial \beta} e^{-3\epsilon \beta} \right)
\]
\[
\frac{\partial}{\partial \beta} e^{-3\epsilon \beta} = -3\epsilon e^{-3\epsilon \beta}
\]
So,
\[
U = N \left[ \epsilon + 3\epsilon e^{-3\epsilon \beta} \right]
\]
\[
= N\epsilon \left( 1 + 3 e^{-3\epsilon / kT} \right)
\]
---
### **Final answer for (b):**
\[
\boxed{
U = N\epsilon \left( 1 + 3 e^{-3\epsilon / kT} \right)
}
\]
---
## **Part (c): Show \( pL = 2U \) **
Recall:
\[
p = kT \frac{\partial}{\partial L} \ln Z
\]
But \( \epsilon = \frac{\hbar^2 \pi^2}{2mL^2} \implies \frac{\partial \epsilon}{\partial L} = -\frac{2\epsilon}{L} \)
From (a):
\[
\ln Z = N \left( -\frac{\epsilon}{kT} + e^{-3\epsilon / kT} \right)
\]
So,
\[
\frac{\partial \ln Z}{\partial L} = N \left( -\frac{1}{kT} \frac{\partial \epsilon}{\partial L} + \frac{\partial}{\partial L} e^{-3\epsilon / kT} \right)
\]
Calculate:
\[
\frac{\partial}{\partial L} e^{-3\epsilon/kT} = e^{-3\epsilon/kT} \left( -\frac{3}{kT} \frac{\partial \epsilon}{\partial L} \right)
\]
\[
= -\frac{3}{kT} \frac{\partial \epsilon}{\partial L} e^{-3\epsilon/kT}
\]
So,
\[
\frac{\partial \ln Z}{\partial L} = N \left( -\frac{1}{kT} \frac{\partial \epsilon}{\partial L} - \frac{3}{kT} \frac{\partial \epsilon}{\partial L} e^{-3\epsilon / kT} \right)
\]
\[
= -N \frac{1}{kT} \frac{\partial \epsilon}{\partial L} \left( 1 + 3 e^{-3\epsilon / kT} \right)
\]
Therefore
\[
p = kT \frac{\partial \ln Z}{\partial L} = -N \frac{\partial \epsilon}{\partial L} \left( 1 + 3 e^{-3\epsilon / kT} \right)
\]
Recall: \( \frac{\partial \epsilon}{\partial L} = -\frac{2\epsilon}{L} \)
So:
\[
p = N \frac{2\epsilon}{L} \left( 1 + 3 e^{-3\epsilon / kT} \right)
\]
Multiply both sides by \( L \):
\[
pL = 2N\epsilon \left( 1 + 3 e^{-3\epsilon / kT} \right)
\]
But from (b), \( U = N\epsilon (1 + 3 e^{-3\epsilon / kT}) \).
Thus,
\[
\boxed{
pL = 2U
}
\]
---
## **Part (d): T → 0 limit**
As \( T \to 0 \), \( e^{-3\epsilon / kT} \to 0 \):
- \( U \to N\epsilon \) (ground state energy, nonzero)
- \( pL \to 2N\epsilon \) (nonzero)
### **Why do energy and pressure not vanish?**
In quantum systems, even at \( T = 0 \), particles occupy the lowest allowed quantum state (ground state), which has nonzero energy due to quantum confinement (zero-point energy). In a classical ideal gas, particles can have zero energy at \( T = 0 \), but in quantum systems, the uncertainty principle forbids this. The pressure is nonzero because the particles still exert force on the walls due to their zero-point motion.
---
### **Summary of Answers:**
**(a):** \(\ln Z = N \left( -\frac{\epsilon}{kT} + e^{-3\epsilon / kT} \right)\)
**(b):** \(U = N\epsilon (1 + 3 e^{-3\epsilon / kT})\)
**(c):** \(pL = 2U\)
**(d):** Neither internal energy nor pressure vanishes as \(T \to 0\) because of quantum zero-point energy: distinguishable quantum particles cannot have zero energy due to confinement in the box (uncertainty principle), so both remain nonzero. In contrast, a classical ideal gas could have zero energy and pressure at \(T = 0\).
📢 Instructions:
- Ask anything relatd to above question only.
- For new Question goto :
VIPSolutions