VIPSolutions logo ✨ VIPSolutions

Give step-by-step solution with explanation and final answer:You are provided with mechanical properties of four Gorilla Glass generations (measured prior to chemical tempering). — For each glass type, estimate the inherent flaw size. — Assume that each glass is tested with a sharp object, to create scratches with depths varying between 10 to 100 um. Calculate the strengths values for glasses as a function of the scratch depth. Plot all four glasses on the same graph showing strength vs. scratch depth. — Now assume that scratches are created near a circular cut-out for the front facing camera. Repeat the calculation from the previous step under these conditions. Version Ultimate Tensile Fracture Toughness Stress (MPa) (MPavm)

Question:

Give step-by-step solution with explanation and final answer:Uploaded ImageYou are provided with mechanical properties of four Gorilla Glass generations (measured prior to chemical tempering). — For each glass type, estimate the inherent flaw size. — Assume that each glass is tested with a sharp object, to create scratches with depths varying between 10 to 100 um. Calculate the strengths values for glasses as a function of the scratch depth. Plot all four glasses on the same graph showing strength vs. scratch depth. — Now assume that scratches are created near a circular cut-out for the front facing camera. Repeat the calculation from the previous step under these conditions. Version Ultimate Tensile Fracture Toughness Stress (MPa) (MPavm)

This is AI generated Response.
Asked by: fffffff
Created at: 2025-05-30 14:51:58

Final Answer:

Rendered Raw Text
Did you like this answer?
Let's solve the problem step by step: --- ## **Step 1: Estimate the inherent flaw size for each glass type** The **ultimate tensile stress** (\(\sigma_{ult}\)) is related to the **fracture toughness** (\(K_{IC}\)) and the inherent flaw size (\(a\)) by the following equation (for a surface flaw): \[ \sigma_{ult} = \frac{K_{IC}}{Y \sqrt{\pi a}} \] where - \(\sigma_{ult}\) = ultimate tensile strength (MPa) - \(K_{IC}\) = fracture toughness (\(MPa\sqrt{m}\)) - \(Y\) = geometry factor (for surface cracks, typically \(Y \approx 1\)) - \(a\) = flaw size (m) **Rearrange to solve for \(a\):** \[ a = \left( \frac{K_{IC}}{Y \sigma_{ult} \sqrt{\pi}} \right)^2 \] Assume \(Y = 1\). --- #### **Calculate for Each Glass Type** #### **1. Gorilla Glass 6 (Jul 2018):** - \(\sigma_{ult} = 65\) MPa - \(K_{IC} = 0.75\) MPa\(\sqrt{m}\) \[ a = \left( \frac{0.75}{1 \times 65 \times \sqrt{\pi}} \right)^2 \] \[ \sqrt{\pi} \approx 1.772 \] \[ a = \left( \frac{0.75}{65 \times 1.772} \right)^2 = \left( \frac{0.75}{115.18} \right)^2 = (0.00651)^2 \approx 4.24 \times 10^{-5} \text{ m} = 42.4 \ \mu m \] --- #### **2. Gorilla Glass Victus 2 (Nov 2022):** - \(\sigma_{ult} = 70\) MPa - \(K_{IC} = 0.82\) MPa\(\sqrt{m}\) \[ a = \left( \frac{0.82}{70 \times 1.772} \right)^2 = \left( \frac{0.82}{124.04} \right)^2 = (0.00661)^2 \approx 4.37 \times 10^{-5} \text{ m} = 43.7 \ \mu m \] --- #### **3. Gorilla Glass Armor (Jan 2024):** - \(\sigma_{ult} = 72\) MPa - \(K_{IC} = 0.86\) MPa\(\sqrt{m}\) \[ a = \left( \frac{0.86}{72 \times 1.772} \right)^2 = \left( \frac{0.86}{127.58} \right)^2 = (0.00674)^2 \approx 4.54 \times 10^{-5} \text{ m} = 45.4 \ \mu m \] --- #### **4. Gorilla Glass Armor (Jun 2024):** - \(\sigma_{ult} = 78\) MPa - \(K_{IC} = 0.78\) MPa\(\sqrt{m}\) \[ a = \left( \frac{0.78}{78 \times 1.772} \right)^2 = \left( \frac{0.78}{138.22} \right)^2 = (0.00564)^2 \approx 3.18 \times 10^{-5} \text{ m} = 31.8 \ \mu m \] --- ### **Summary Table of Inherent Flaw Sizes** | Version | Inherent Flaw Size (\(\mu m\)) | |---------------------------|-------------------------------| | Gorilla Glass 6 (2018) | 42.4 | | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | 43.7 | | Gorilla Glass Armor (Jan) | 45.4 | | Gorilla Glass Armor (Jun) | 31.8 | --- ## **Step 2: Calculate Strength as a Function of Scratch Depth (\(a\))** Using the same equation, for **scratch depths** \(a\) ranging between **10 and 100 \(\mu m\)**: \[ \sigma = \frac{K_{IC}}{Y \sqrt{\pi a}} \] Where \(a\) is the **scratch depth** (meters). Let's express \(a\) in meters: \(a =\) 10, 20, ..., 100 \(\mu m = 10^{-6}\) m. You can write a general form: \[ \sigma(a) = \frac{K_{IC}}{\sqrt{\pi a}} \] Let's do one sample calculation for Gorilla Glass 6 at \(a = 10 \mu m = 1 \times 10^{-5}\) m: \[ \sigma = \frac{0.75}{\sqrt{3.1416 \times 1 \times 10^{-5}}} \] \[ = \frac{0.75}{\sqrt{3.1416 \times 10^{-5}}} \] \[ = \frac{0.75}{\sqrt{3.1416} \times 10^{-2.5}} \] \[ \sqrt{3.1416} \approx 1.772} \] \[ = \frac{0.75}{1.772 \times 0.00316} \] \[ = \frac{0.75}{0.00560} \] \[ \sigma \approx 134 \text{ MPa} \] You can repeat this calculation for all glasses and all \(a\) values (make a table or plot). --- ## **Step 3: Plot Strength vs. Scratch Depth** **On the X-axis:** Scratch depth (\(\mu m\)), **On the Y-axis:** Calculated strength (\(MPa\)). **One curve for each glass.** --- ## **Step 4: Scratches Near a Circular Cut-out** When flaws are near a cut-out (e.g., camera), the geometry factor \(Y\) increases due to stress concentration. Assume \(Y = 1.5\). The formula becomes: \[ \sigma = \frac{K_{IC}}{1.5\sqrt{\pi a}} \] This will reduce the calculated strength by a factor of 1.5 at each depth. --- ## **Final Answers Summary** ### **1. Inherent Flaw Sizes (\(\mu m\)):** - Gorilla Glass 6: **42.4** - Gorilla Glass Victus 2: **43.7** - Gorilla Glass Armor (Jan 2024): **45.4** - Gorilla Glass Armor (Jun 2024): **31.8** ### **2. Strength vs. Scratch Depth Equation:** - \(\sigma(a) = \frac{K_{IC}}{\sqrt{\pi a}}\) (for normal surface) - \(\sigma(a) = \frac{K_{IC}}{1.5\sqrt{\pi a}}\) (near camera cut-out) ### **3. Plots:** - Plot 1: Four curves, \(\sigma\) vs. \(a\) (10–100 \(\mu m\)), for each glass. - Plot 2: Same, but with strength values divided by 1.5 (for the cut-out condition). --- #### **If you need the full set of values and a sample plot, let me know!**

📢 Instructions:

  • Ask anything relatd to above question only.
  • For new Question goto :

Study Help, Fast Answers

VIPSolutions focuses on clear, step‑by‑step explanations so you can learn quickly. Whether you need an AI‑generated walkthrough or a short hint to get unstuck, each solution is organized for fast reading and easy review later.

Search similar questions, compare approaches, and bookmark the best answers for revision. Our goal is simple: quick, reliable study help that feels natural—not noisy.