Give step-by-step solution with explanation and final answer:Problem 2: (30)
The water engineer of a city’s municipal department plans to build a water tank to address the increasing
water demand of the city’s fast-growing population. The available space for the tank (excluding access), is
600 t2 The planned inside depth of the tank is 10 ft., and it is desired that its length is at least twice its
width (Length and width are outside dimensions). Space limitations dictate that the width cannot exceed
20 ft. The tank will be built with reinforced concrete of 1 ft. thickness (walls, base, and cover). The city
seeks to reduce the total cost of the concrete construction. The unit cost of concrete construction, which
includes not only concrete material costs but also formwork and other related costs, is $550/m?® (1m® =
35.315 ft)
Find:
(a) Formulate the problem indicating decision variables, objective function, and constraints. (15)
(b) Solve the problem using Excel Solver and provide optimal tank dimension and cost. Round off tank
dimensions to the nearest 3”. (Hint: Use GRG Nonlinear solving method and initial non-zero
decision variable values) (15)
Question:
Give step-by-step solution with explanation and final answer:Problem 2: (30)
The water engineer of a city’s municipal department plans to build a water tank to address the increasing
water demand of the city’s fast-growing population. The available space for the tank (excluding access), is
600 t2 The planned inside depth of the tank is 10 ft., and it is desired that its length is at least twice its
width (Length and width are outside dimensions). Space limitations dictate that the width cannot exceed
20 ft. The tank will be built with reinforced concrete of 1 ft. thickness (walls, base, and cover). The city
seeks to reduce the total cost of the concrete construction. The unit cost of concrete construction, which
includes not only concrete material costs but also formwork and other related costs, is $550/m?® (1m® =
35.315 ft)
Find:
(a) Formulate the problem indicating decision variables, objective function, and constraints. (15)
(b) Solve the problem using Excel Solver and provide optimal tank dimension and cost. Round off tank
dimensions to the nearest 3”. (Hint: Use GRG Nonlinear solving method and initial non-zero
decision variable values) (15)
This is AI generated Response.
Asked by: fffffff
Created at: 2025-05-30 12:51:22
Final Answer:
RenderedRaw Text
Did you like this answer?
Let's break down the problem and solve it step by step.
---
## **(a) Problem Formulation**
### **1. Decision Variables**
Let:
- \( L \): **Outside length** of the tank (in ft)
- \( W \): **Outside width** of the tank (in ft)
### **2. Objective Function**
Minimize the **total cost** of concrete construction.
#### **Calculation of Volume of Concrete:**
- **Outside Length = L**
- **Outside Width = W**
- **Outside Depth = 10 ft** (inside) + 2 × 1 ft (walls) = **12 ft** (outside)
- **Thickness = 1 ft**
##### **a. Volume of Concrete for Walls:**
- **Side Walls (2 pieces):**
- Height = 10 ft (inside), thickness = 1 ft, length = L (outside)
- Each wall: \( L \times 10 \times 1 \)
- Total for both: \( 2 \times L \times 10 \times 1 \)
- **End Walls (2 pieces):**
- Height = 10 ft, thickness = 1 ft, width = W (outside)
- Each wall: \( W \times 10 \times 1 \)
- Total for both: \( 2 \times W \times 10 \times 1 \)
##### **b. Volume of Concrete for Base and Cover:**
- **Base:** \( L \times W \times 1 \)
- **Cover:** \( L \times W \times 1 \)
##### **c. Total Volume:**
\[
\text{Total Volume} = 2L \cdot 10 \cdot 1 + 2W \cdot 10 \cdot 1 + 2L \cdot W \cdot 1
\]
\[
= 20L + 20W + 2LW \quad \text{(in ft}^3\text{)}
\]
Convert to \( m^3 \):
\[
\text{Total Volume (in } m^3) = \frac{20L + 20W + 2LW}{35.315}
\]
##### **d. Cost Function:**
\[
\text{Cost} = \frac{20L + 20W + 2LW}{35.315} \times 550
\]
---
### **3. Constraints**
#### **a. Area Constraint:**
\[
L \times W \leq 600 \quad \text{(ft}^2\text{)}
\]
#### **b. Length and Width Relationship:**
\[
L \geq 2W
\]
#### **c. Width Limitation:**
\[
W \leq 20
\]
#### **d. Positive Dimensions:**
\[
L > 0,\ W > 0
\]
---
### **Summary (Formulation)**
- **Decision Variables:** \( L, W \)
- **Objective:** Minimize \(\quad C = \frac{20L + 20W + 2LW}{35.315} \times 550 \)
- **Subject to:**
- \( L \times W \leq 600 \)
- \( L \geq 2W \)
- \( W \leq 20 \)
- \( L > 0, W > 0 \)
---
## **(b) Solve Using Excel Solver**
### **How to Set Up in Excel (Step-by-Step):**
1. **Set up cells:**
- B1: `L` (Length in ft)
- B2: `W` (Width in ft)
- B3: `=20*B1+20*B2+2*B1*B2` (Total concrete volume in ft³)
- B4: `=B3/35.315` (Total concrete volume in m³)
- B5: `=B4*550` (Total cost in $)
- B6: `=B1*B2` (Area)
- B7: `=B1-2*B2` (L - 2W)
2. **Set initial values:**
- B1: 40 (example)
- B2: 15 (example)
3. **Open Solver:**
- **Set Objective:** B5 (Minimize)
- **By Changing Variable Cells:** B1, B2
- **Subject to Constraints:**
- B6 <= 600
- B1 >= 2*B2 (or B7 >= 0)
- B2 <= 20
- B1 > 0, B2 > 0
- **Solving Method:** GRG Nonlinear
4. **Solve.**
5. **Round answers to nearest 3":** (3 inches = 0.25 ft).
---
### **Sample Calculation (Manual Trial for Understanding):**
Let’s try \( W = 20 \) (max allowed):
- \( L = \frac{600}{20} = 30 \) ft (to use all 600 ft²)
- Check \( L \geq 2W \): \( 30 \geq 40 \)? **No**. Not feasible.
Try \( W = 15 \):
- \( L = \frac{600}{15} = 40 \) ft
- \( L \geq 2 \times 15 = 30 \), OK.
Compute:
- Volume: \( 20 \times 40 + 20 \times 15 + 2 \times 40 \times 15 = 800 + 300 + 1200 = 2300 \) ft³
- \( 2300/35.315 = 65.15 \) m³
- Cost: \( 65.15 \times 550 = \$35,832.5 \)
Try \( W = 20 \) and \( L = 40 \):
- Area: \( 20 \times 40 = 800 \) ft² (too much, so not feasible)
Try \( W = 13 \):
- \( L = 600 / 13 = 46.15 \) ft
- \( L \geq 26 \), OK.
Check cost:
- Volume: \( 20 \times 46.15 + 20 \times 13 + 2 \times 46.15 \times 13 = 923 + 260 + 1199.9 = 2382.9 \)
- \( 2382.9/35.315 = 67.48 \) m³
- Cost: \( 67.48 \times 550 = \$37,114 \)
**Lower width gives lower cost**.
---
### **Optimal Solution (Using Solver):**
Run Solver in Excel as described above. The minimum will likely occur at the smallest width where \( L = 2W \) and \( L \times W = 600 \):
Let \( L = 2W \), so \( (2W) \cdot W = 600 \implies W^2 = 300 \implies W = \sqrt{300} = 17.32 \) ft, \( L = 34.64 \) ft
Round to nearest 3":
- 17.32 ft ≈ 17.25 ft (17 ft 3"),
- 34.64 ft ≈ 34.5 ft (34 ft 6")
---
#### **Final Answer (Rounded to Nearest 3")**
\[
\boxed{
\begin{array}{l}
\textbf{Optimal Dimensions:} \\
\quad \text{Width (W)} = 17.25 \text{ ft} \\
\quad \text{Length (L)} = 34.5 \text{ ft} \\
\\
\textbf{Minimum Cost:} \\
\quad \text{Concrete Volume: } 2 \times 17.25 \times 34.5 + 20 \times 17.25 + 20 \times 34.5 = \\
\quad 2 \times 595.125 + 345 + 690 = 1190.25 + 345 + 690 = 2225.25 \text{ ft}^3 \\
\quad 2225.25/35.315 = 63.05 \text{ m}^3 \\
\quad \text{Cost} = 63.05 \times 550 = \$34,677.5 \\
\\
\text{(Rounded to nearest \$0.50)}
\end{array}
}
\]
---
### **Summary Table**
| Variable | Value (ft) | Rounded (nearest 3") |
|----------|------------|----------------------|
| Width (W) | 17.32 | **17.25** |
| Length (L) | 34.64 | **34.5** |
| Volume (ft³) | Volume (m³) | Cost (\$) |
|--------------|-------------|-----------|
| 2225.25 | 63.05 | 34,677.5 |
---
### **Excel Setup Screenshot (for documentation)**
If you need a screenshot or template, let me know!
---
**Let me know if you need the Excel file or further clarifications!**
VIPSolutions focuses on clear, step‑by‑step explanations so you can learn quickly. Whether you need an AI‑generated walkthrough or a short hint to get unstuck, each solution is organized for fast reading and easy review later.
Search similar questions, compare approaches, and bookmark the best answers for revision. Our goal is simple: quick, reliable study help that feels natural—not noisy.