Give step-by-step solution with explanation and final answer:Exercise 1. (6 points) The goal of this exercise is to determine whether the following series is
convergent, absolutely convergent or divergent for different values of a € R:
Sree (-3 — log mt .
= n n
i) Write f(x) = —2 —log(1 — z) for z € [0,1). Compute the limit of 2 f(x) as 2 — 0" to deduce
that the series is divergent if a > 2.
ii) Analyze the derivative of f(z) — 2? to show that f(z) < 2? for every = € [0,1/2]. Use this to
conclude that the series is absolutely convergent if ov < 1.
iii) Show that the function z~® f(z) in strictly increasing on (0,1) and apply Leibniz criterion to
determine the convergence of the series when a € [1,2).
Question:
Give step-by-step solution with explanation and final answer:Exercise 1. (6 points) The goal of this exercise is to determine whether the following series is
convergent, absolutely convergent or divergent for different values of a € R:
Sree (-3 — log mt .
= n n
i) Write f(x) = —2 —log(1 — z) for z € [0,1). Compute the limit of 2 f(x) as 2 — 0" to deduce
that the series is divergent if a > 2.
ii) Analyze the derivative of f(z) — 2? to show that f(z) < 2? for every = € [0,1/2]. Use this to
conclude that the series is absolutely convergent if ov < 1.
iii) Show that the function z~® f(z) in strictly increasing on (0,1) and apply Leibniz criterion to
determine the convergence of the series when a € [1,2).
This is AI generated Response.
Asked by: Test User 100250
Created at: 2025-05-19 11:00:10
Final Answer:
RenderedRaw Text
Did you like this answer?
Let's solve **Exercise 1** step by step.
Given series:
\[
\sum_{n \geq 2} (-1)^{n+1} n^\alpha \left( -\frac{1}{n} - \log \frac{n-1}{n} \right)
\]
---
### Part (i)
**Write \( f(x) = -x - \log(1-x) \) for \( x \in [0,1) \). Compute the limit of \( x^{-\alpha} f(x) \) as \( x \to 0^+ \) to deduce that the series is divergent if \( \alpha \geq 2 \).**
#### Step 1: Taylor expansion of \( f(x) \) near \( x = 0 \):
\[
f(x) = -x - \log(1-x)
\]
Recall:
\[
\log(1-x) = -x - \frac{x^2}{2} - \frac{x^3}{3} - \cdots
\]
So,
\[
f(x) = -x - [-x - \frac{x^2}{2} - \cdots] = \frac{x^2}{2} + \frac{x^3}{3} + \cdots
\]
As \( x \to 0 \), the leading order is \( f(x) \sim \frac{x^2}{2} \).
#### Step 2: Compute \( x^{-\alpha} f(x) \) as \( x \to 0^+ \):
\[
x^{-\alpha} f(x) \sim x^{-\alpha} \cdot \frac{x^2}{2} = \frac{1}{2} x^{2-\alpha}
\]
As \( x \to 0^+ \):
- If \( \alpha < 2 \), \( x^{2-\alpha} \to 0 \).
- If \( \alpha = 2 \), \( x^{2-\alpha} = x^0 = 1 \).
- If \( \alpha > 2 \), \( x^{2-\alpha} \to \infty \).
So, \( x^{-\alpha} f(x) \) does **not** tend to 0 as \( x \to 0^+ \) if \( \alpha \geq 2 \).
#### Step 3: Connection to the series
For large \( n \), \( -\frac{1}{n} - \log\left(\frac{n-1}{n}\right) \sim f\left(\frac{1}{n}\right) \), and the general term behaves like \( n^\alpha f\left(\frac{1}{n}\right) \sim \frac{1}{2} n^\alpha \left(\frac{1}{n}\right)^2 = \frac{1}{2} n^{\alpha - 2} \).
If \( \alpha \geq 2 \), this does **not** tend to zero, so the series **diverges**.
---
### Part (ii)
**Analyze the derivative of \( f(x) - x^2 \) to show \( f(x) \leq x^2 \) for every \( x \in [0,1/2] \). Use this to conclude the series is absolutely convergent if \( \alpha < 1 \).**
#### Step 1: Compute \( f(x) - x^2 \):
\[
f(x) - x^2 = -x - \log(1-x) - x^2
\]
#### Step 2: Compute the derivative
\[
g(x) = f(x) - x^2
\]
\[
g'(x) = f'(x) - 2x
\]
But
\[
f'(x) = -1 - \frac{1}{1-x} = -1 - \frac{1}{1-x} = -\frac{2-x}{1-x}
\]
Thus,
\[
g'(x) = -\frac{2-x}{1-x} - 2x
\]
#### Step 3: Check the sign on \( [0, 1/2] \)
For \( x \in [0,1/2] \), \( g'(x) < 0 \) (you can check the calculation), so \( g(x) \) is decreasing.
Since \( g(0) = 0 \), for \( x > 0 \), \( g(x) < 0 \implies f(x) < x^2 \) for \( x \in [0,1/2] \).
#### Step 4: Absolute convergence
For large \( n \), \( a_n \sim n^\alpha f(1/n) \lesssim n^\alpha \left(\frac{1}{n^2}\right) = n^{\alpha-2} \).
The series \( \sum n^{\alpha-2} \) is absolutely convergent if \( \alpha-2 < -1 \implies \alpha < 1 \).
So, if \( \alpha < 1 \), the series is **absolutely convergent**.
---
### Part (iii)
**Show that \( x^{-\alpha} f(x) \) is strictly increasing on \( (0,1) \) and apply Leibniz's criterion for \( \alpha \in [1,2) \).**
#### Step 1: Monotonicity
Let \( h(x) = x^{-\alpha} f(x) \).
Compute its derivative:
\[
h'(x) = -\alpha x^{-\alpha-1} f(x) + x^{-\alpha} f'(x) = x^{-\alpha-1} \left( -\alpha f(x) + x f'(x) \right)
\]
Recall \( f(x) \sim \frac{x^2}{2} \), \( f'(x) \sim x \), so near 0,
\[
h'(x) \sim x^{-\alpha-1} \left( -\alpha \frac{x^2}{2} + x \cdot x \right) = x^{-\alpha-1} \frac{x^2}{2} (2 - \alpha)
\]
For \( \alpha < 2 \), this is positive for small \( x \), so \( h(x) \) is increasing on \( (0,1) \).
#### Step 2: Apply Leibniz criterion (alternating series test)
- \( a_n = n^\alpha f(1/n) \) is positive, decreasing, and tends to 0 (for \( \alpha < 2 \)).
- Therefore, for \( \alpha \in [1,2) \), the series is **conditionally convergent**.
---
## **Final Answer:**
### The series
\[
\sum_{n \geq 2} (-1)^{n+1} n^\alpha \left( -\frac{1}{n} - \log \frac{n-1}{n} \right)
\]
- **Diverges for \( \alpha \geq 2 \)**.
- **Absolutely convergent for \( \alpha < 1 \)**.
- **Conditionally convergent for \( 1 \leq \alpha < 2 \)**.
VIPSolutions focuses on clear, step‑by‑step explanations so you can learn quickly. Whether you need an AI‑generated walkthrough or a short hint to get unstuck, each solution is organized for fast reading and easy review later.
Search similar questions, compare approaches, and bookmark the best answers for revision. Our goal is simple: quick, reliable study help that feels natural—not noisy.