Give step-by-step solution with explanation and final answer:Consider the following process scheme describing a chemostat with a recycle.
Separator
r stor
[1]
V
xs
®
The product stream of the chemostat is separated into two streams, and one of them (cell-rich
stream) is recycled into the reactor. The recycle ratio is defined as @ = = and the cell concentration
ratio in the cell separator is defined as C = 2
a) Write the mass balance for biomass around the chemostat.
b) Assuming steady-state operation with sterile fresh feed (Xo=0), a nd neglecting cell death
(ks = 0), show that the growth rate is proportional to the dilution rate with the following
relationship: pt = D[1 + a(1 — €)]
Question:
Give step-by-step solution with explanation and final answer:Consider the following process scheme describing a chemostat with a recycle.
Separator
r stor
[1]
V
xs
®
The product stream of the chemostat is separated into two streams, and one of them (cell-rich
stream) is recycled into the reactor. The recycle ratio is defined as @ = = and the cell concentration
ratio in the cell separator is defined as C = 2
a) Write the mass balance for biomass around the chemostat.
b) Assuming steady-state operation with sterile fresh feed (Xo=0), a nd neglecting cell death
(ks = 0), show that the growth rate is proportional to the dilution rate with the following
relationship: pt = D[1 + a(1 — €)]
This is AI generated Response.
Asked by: francis
Created at: 2026-01-05 02:50:09
Final Answer:
RenderedRaw Text
Did you like this answer?
Let's break down the solution step-by-step for both parts (**a** and **b**):
---
## **a) Mass Balance for Biomass Around the Chemostat**
### **Definitions**
- \( F \): Fresh feed flow rate (with substrate, no cells)
- \( F_s \): Product stream flow rate (cells + substrate)
- \( R \): Recycle flow rate (cell-rich stream)
- \( x_ \): Cell concentration in feed (usually )
- \( x \): Cell concentration in the reactor (and in the product stream)
- \( x_R \): Cell concentration in the recycle stream
- \( \alpha = \frac{R}{F} \): **Recycle ratio**
- \( C = \frac{x_R}{x} \): **Cell concentration ratio in separator**
### **Total Outflow**
From the diagram:
Total outflow = \( F_s + R \)
But, **in steady-state**:
Total inflow = Total outflow \(\implies F = F_s + R \implies F_s = F - R\)
### **Biomass Mass Balance (Steady-State)**
At steady-state, **accumulation = **:
\[
\text{In} - \text{Out} + \text{Generation} =
\]
#### **Inflow of Biomass:**
- From fresh feed: \( F x_ \) (often \( x_ = \))
- From recycle: \( R x_R \)
#### **Outflow of Biomass:**
- Out in product stream: \( F_s x \)
#### **Generation:**
- Net cell growth in reactor: \( \mu x V \), where \( V \) is reactor volume, \( \mu \) is specific growth rate
#### **Total Balance:**
\[
F x_ + R x_R + (\mu x V) - F_s x =
\]
Alternatively, rearrange:
\[
F x_ + R x_R + (\mu x V) = F_s x
\]
---
## **b) Show the Growth Rate Relationship**
**Assumptions:**
- Steady-state (\( \text{accumulation} = \))
- Fresh feed is sterile (\( x_ = \))
- No cell death (\( k_d = \))
### **Step 1: Substitute Known Values**
- \( F_s = F - R = F(1 - \alpha) \)
- \( R = \alpha F \)
- \( x_R = C x \)
The mass balance for biomass (from above, and with \( x_ = \)):
\[
+ R x_R + (\mu x V) = F_s x
\]
\[
R x_R + \mu x V = F_s x
\]
### **Step 2: Substitute Expressions**
\[
(\alpha F)(C x) + \mu x V = [F (1 - \alpha)] x
\]
Divide both sides by \( x \):
\[
\alpha F C + \mu V = F(1 - \alpha)
\]
### **Step 3: Isolate for \( \mu \)**
\[
\mu V = F(1 - \alpha) - \alpha F C
\]
\[
\mu V = F [1 - \alpha - \alpha C]
\]
### **Step 4: Express in Terms of Dilution Rate \( D \)**
The **dilution rate** is defined as \( D = \frac{F}{V} \):
\[
\mu V = F [1 - \alpha (1 + C)]
\]
But that's not matching the target expression. Let's carefully expand:
Go back:
\[
\alpha F C + \mu V = F(1 - \alpha)
\]
\[
\mu V = F(1 - \alpha) - \alpha F C
\]
\[
\mu V = F [1 - \alpha - \alpha C]
\]
Wait: \( 1 - \alpha - \alpha C = 1 - \alpha (1 + C) \)
But the target is \( \mu = D[1 + \alpha(1 - C)] \).
Let's try a different algebraic arrangement:
Expand \( F_s x = F x - R x \):
From mass balance:
\[
R x_R + \mu x V = (F - R) x
\]
\[
R x_R + \mu x V = F x - R x
\]
\[
R x_R + R x + \mu x V = F x
\]
\[
R(x_R + x) + \mu x V = F x
\]
But since \( x_R = C x \):
\[
R(x_R + x) = R(C x + x) = R x (1 + C)
\]
So:
\[
R x (1 + C) + \mu x V = F x
\]
Divide by \( x \):
\[
R(1 + C) + \mu V = F
\]
\[
\mu V = F - R(1 + C)
\]
Substitute \( R = \alpha F \):
\[
\mu V = F - \alpha F (1 + C)
\]
\[
\mu V = F [1 - \alpha(1 + C)]
\]
Now, divide both sides by \( V \):
\[
\mu = \frac{F}{V} [1 - \alpha(1 + C)]
\]
\[
\mu = D [1 - \alpha(1 + C)]
\]
Wait, but the required expression is \( \mu = D [1 + \alpha(1 - C)] \).
Let's try expanding \( 1 + \alpha(1 - C) \):
\[
1 + \alpha(1 - C) = 1 + \alpha - \alpha C = (1 + \alpha) - \alpha C
\]
Similarly, our result is:
\[
1 - \alpha(1 + C) = 1 - \alpha - \alpha C = (1 - \alpha) - \alpha C
\]
Let's check for sign errors. Let's go back to the original mass balance:
**Original mass balance:**
\[
F x_ + R x_R + \mu x V = F_s x
\]
With \( x_ = \), \( F_s = F - R \):
\[
R x_R + \mu x V = (F - R) x
\]
\[
R x_R + \mu x V = F x - R x
\]
\[
R x_R + R x + \mu x V = F x
\]
\[
R(x_R + x) + \mu x V = F x
\]
\[
R(x_R + x) = F x - \mu x V
\]
\[
R(x_R + x) = x(F - \mu V)
\]
\[
R = \frac{x(F - \mu V)}{x_R + x}
\]
But we want \( \mu \) in terms of \( D \):
From above:
\[
R(x_R + x) + \mu x V = F x
\]
\[
\mu x V = F x - R(x_R + x)
\]
\[
\mu = \frac{F x - R(x_R + x)}{x V}
\]
\[
\mu = \frac{F}{V} - \frac{R}{V} \left( \frac{x_R + x}{x} \right)
\]
\[
\mu = D - \frac{R}{V} \left( 1 + \frac{x_R}{x} \right)
\]
But \( \frac{R}{V} = \alpha D \) and \( \frac{x_R}{x} = C \):
\[
\mu = D - \alpha D (1 + C)
\]
\[
\mu = D [1 - \alpha(1 + C)]
\]
But the question wants \( \mu = D [1 + \alpha(1 - C)] \).
Now, note that \( 1 - \alpha(1 + C) = 1 - \alpha - \alpha C \), and \( 1 + \alpha(1 - C) = 1 + \alpha - \alpha C \).
So, the only difference is the sign of \( \alpha \).
This suggests the recycle ratio is sometimes defined as \( \alpha = \frac{R}{F_s} \) instead of \( \frac{R}{F} \). Let's check if changing the definition matches the book formula.
If \( \alpha = \frac{R}{F_s} \), then \( R = \alpha F_s \), and \( F = F_s + R = F_s(1 + \alpha) \implies F_s = \frac{F}{1 + \alpha} \).
Now, try the mass balance with this definition:
- \( R = \alpha F_s \)
- \( x_R = C x \)
- \( F_s = \frac{F}{1 + \alpha} \)
Original mass balance (using \( F x_ = \)):
\[
R x_R + \mu x V = F_s x
\]
\[
\alpha F_s (C x) + \mu x V = F_s x
\]
\[
\alpha F_s C x + \mu x V = F_s x
\]
\[
\mu x V = F_s x - \alpha F_s C x
\]
\[
\mu V = F_s (1 - \alpha C)
\]
But \( F_s = \frac{F}{1 + \alpha} \):
\[
\mu V = \frac{F}{1 + \alpha} (1 - \alpha C)
\]
\[
\mu = \frac{F}{V} \frac{1 - \alpha C}{1 + \alpha}
\]
But that's not matching the book formula either.
### **Conclusion and Final Answer**
#### **a) Mass balance for biomass:**
\[
F x_ + R x_R + (\mu x V) = F_s x
\]
where \( x_ \) is the biomass in the feed, \( R \) is the recycle flow, \( x_R \) is the recycle cell concentration, \( \mu \) is the specific growth rate, \( x \) is the reactor cell concentration, and \( F_s \) is the product stream flow rate.
#### **b) Growth rate relationship:**
Given the definitions in the problem (\( \alpha = \frac{R}{F} \), \( C = \frac{x_R}{x} \)), and under steady-state, sterile feed (\( x_ = \)), and no cell death (\( k_d = \)), the growth rate is:
\[
\boxed{
\mu = D [1 - \alpha(1 + C)]
}
\]
where \( D = \frac{F}{V} \) is the dilution rate.
> **Note:** If you are required to match the form \( \mu = D [1 + \alpha(1 - C)] \), double-check the definition of \( \alpha \) in your course notes. The above derivation follows the definitions as given in your problem. If the book uses \( \alpha = \frac{R}{F_s} \), the formula will be different.
---
### **Summary Table**
| Term | Definition |
|----------------|--------------------------------------|
| \( F \) | Feed flow rate |
| \( F_s \) | Product stream flow rate |
| \( R \) | Recycle flow rate |
| \( x \) | Cell concentration (reactor) |
| \( x_ \) | Cell conc. in feed (usually ) |
| \( x_R \) | Cell conc. in recycle |
| \( \alpha \) | Recycle ratio (\( \frac{R}{F} \)) |
| \( C \) | Cell conc. ratio (\( \frac{x_R}{x} \))|
| \( D \) | Dilution rate (\( \frac{F}{V} \)) |
---
Let me know if you need clarification on any step!
VIPSolutions focuses on clear, step‑by‑step explanations so you can learn quickly. Whether you need an AI‑generated walkthrough or a short hint to get unstuck, each solution is organized for fast reading and easy review later.
Search similar questions, compare approaches, and bookmark the best answers for revision. Our goal is simple: quick, reliable study help that feels natural—not noisy.