Convert the i-system to e-system using slack variables. Then construct a table of all basic solution, Indicate whether or not it is feasible.
Q2:
Convert the i-system to e-system using slack variables.
Then construct a table of all basic solution,
Indicate whether or not it is feasible.
x1+3x2≤18
5x1+4x2≤35
x≥0,y≥0
solve me this solution step by step with explanation and conclusion
Question:
Convert the i-system to e-system using slack variables. Then construct a table of all basic solution, Indicate whether or not it is feasible.
Q2:
Convert the i-system to e-system using slack variables.
Then construct a table of all basic solution,
Indicate whether or not it is feasible.
x1+3x2≤18
5x1+4x2≤35
x≥0,y≥0
solve me this solution step by step with explanation and conclusion
This is AI generated Response.
Asked by: Test User 100052
Created at: 2025-04-26 07:08:54
Final Answer:
RenderedRaw Text
Did you like this answer?
Let's proceed **step by step** as requested:
---
## **Step 1: Write the i-system**
The given system (i-system) is:
\[
\begin{align*}
x_1 + 3x_2 &\leq 18 \\
5x_1 + 4x_2 &\leq 35 \\
x_1, x_2 &\geq 0
\end{align*}
\]
---
## **Step 2: Convert to e-system (standard form) using slack variables**
We introduce **slack variables** \( s_1 \) and \( s_2 \) to convert the inequalities into equalities:
\[
\begin{align*}
x_1 + 3x_2 + s_1 &= 18 \qquad (s_1 \geq 0) \\
5x_1 + 4x_2 + s_2 &= 35 \qquad (s_2 \geq 0) \\
x_1, x_2, s_1, s_2 &\geq 0
\end{align*}
\]
---
## **Step 3: List all basic solutions**
For a system of \( m \) equations with \( n \) variables, a **basic solution** is found by setting \( n-m \) variables to zero and solving for the rest.
- Here, \( m = 2 \) equations, \( n = 4 \) variables (\( x_1, x_2, s_1, s_2 \))
- So, in each basic solution, set \( 4-2 = 2 \) variables to zero, solve for the remaining 2.
### **Possible combinations:**
Let’s enumerate all possible pairs of variables to be considered as **basic variables** (solved for), while the other two are set to zero.
The variables: \( x_1, x_2, s_1, s_2 \)
The possible basic variable pairs:
1. \( x_1, x_2 \)
2. \( x_1, s_1 \)
3. \( x_1, s_2 \)
4. \( x_2, s_1 \)
5. \( x_2, s_2 \)
6. \( s_1, s_2 \)
Let’s find the solution for each.
---
## **Step 4: Compute all basic solutions**
We will set the non-basic variables to zero and solve for the basic variables in each case.
### **Case 1: Basic variables \( x_1, x_2 \), set \( s_1 = s_2 = 0 \)**
\[
\begin{align*}
x_1 + 3x_2 = 18 \\
5x_1 + 4x_2 = 35
\end{align*}
\]
Solve:
Multiply first equation by 5:
\[
5x_1 + 15x_2 = 90
\]
Subtract the second equation:
\[
(5x_1 + 15x_2) - (5x_1 + 4x_2) = 90 - 35 \implies 11x_2 = 55 \implies x_2 = 5
\]
Substitute into first equation:
\[
x_1 + 3(5) = 18 \implies x_1 = 18 - 15 = 3
\]
So:
- \( x_1 = 3 \)
- \( x_2 = 5 \)
- \( s_1 = 0 \)
- \( s_2 = 0 \)
Check non-negativity: all variables \(\geq 0\), so **feasible**.
---
### **Case 2: Basic variables \( x_1, s_1 \), set \( x_2 = s_2 = 0 \)**
\[
\begin{align*}
x_1 + 3(0) + s_1 = 18 \implies x_1 + s_1 = 18 \\
5x_1 + 4(0) + 0 = 35 \implies 5x_1 = 35 \implies x_1 = 7
\end{align*}
\]
Plug back:
\[
7 + s_1 = 18 \implies s_1 = 11
\]
So:
- \( x_1 = 7 \)
- \( x_2 = 0 \)
- \( s_1 = 11 \)
- \( s_2 = 0 \)
Check non-negativity: all variables \(\geq 0\), so **feasible**.
---
### **Case 3: Basic variables \( x_1, s_2 \), set \( x_2 = s_1 = 0 \)**
\[
\begin{align*}
x_1 + 3(0) + 0 = 18 \implies x_1 = 18 \\
5x_1 + 4(0) + s_2 = 35 \implies 5(18) + s_2 = 35 \implies 90 + s_2 = 35 \implies s_2 = 35 - 90 = -55
\end{align*}
\]
So:
- \( x_1 = 18 \)
- \( x_2 = 0 \)
- \( s_1 = 0 \)
- \( s_2 = -55 \)
Check non-negativity: \( s_2 < 0 \), so **not feasible**.
---
### **Case 4: Basic variables \( x_2, s_1 \), set \( x_1 = s_2 = 0 \)**
\[
\begin{align*}
0 + 3x_2 + s_1 = 18 \implies 3x_2 + s_1 = 18 \\
5(0) + 4x_2 + 0 = 35 \implies 4x_2 = 35 \implies x_2 = 8.75
\end{align*}
\]
Plug back:
\[
3(8.75) + s_1 = 18 \implies 26.25 + s_1 = 18 \implies s_1 = 18 - 26.25 = -8.25
\]
So:
- \( x_1 = 0 \)
- \( x_2 = 8.75 \)
- \( s_1 = -8.25 \)
- \( s_2 = 0 \)
Check non-negativity: \( s_1 < 0 \), so **not feasible**.
---
### **Case 5: Basic variables \( x_2, s_2 \), set \( x_1 = s_1 = 0 \)**
\[
\begin{align*}
0 + 3x_2 + 0 = 18 \implies 3x_2 = 18 \implies x_2 = 6 \\
5(0) + 4x_2 + s_2 = 35 \implies 4(6) + s_2 = 35 \implies 24 + s_2 = 35 \implies s_2 = 11
\end{align*}
\]
So:
- \( x_1 = 0 \)
- \( x_2 = 6 \)
- \( s_1 = 0 \)
- \( s_2 = 11 \)
Check non-negativity: all variables \(\geq 0\), so **feasible**.
---
### **Case 6: Basic variables \( s_1, s_2 \), set \( x_1 = x_2 = 0 \)**
\[
\begin{align*}
0 + 0 + s_1 = 18 \implies s_1 = 18 \\
5(0) + 4(0) + s_2 = 35 \implies s_2 = 35
\end{align*}
\]
So:
- \( x_1 = 0 \)
- \( x_2 = 0 \)
- \( s_1 = 18 \)
- \( s_2 = 35 \)
Check non-negativity: all variables \(\geq 0\), so **feasible**.
---
## **Step 5: Summary Table of All Basic Solutions**
| Case | Basic Vars | \( x_1 \) | \( x_2 \) | \( s_1 \) | \( s_2 \) | Feasible? |
|------|--------------|-----------|-----------|-----------|-----------|-----------|
| 1 | \( x_1, x_2 \) | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | Yes |
| 2 | \( x_1, s_1 \) | 7 | 0 | 11 | 0 | Yes |
| 3 | \( x_1, s_2 \) | 18 | 0 | 0 | -55 | No |
| 4 | \( x_2, s_
VIPSolutions focuses on clear, step‑by‑step explanations so you can learn quickly. Whether you need an AI‑generated walkthrough or a short hint to get unstuck, each solution is organized for fast reading and easy review later.
Search similar questions, compare approaches, and bookmark the best answers for revision. Our goal is simple: quick, reliable study help that feels natural—not noisy.