Singleton Supplies Corporation
(
SSC
)
manufactures medical products for hospitals, clinics, and nursing homes. SSC may introduce a new type of X
-
ray scanner designed to identify certain types of cancers in their early stages. There are a number of uncertainties about the proposed project, but the following data are believed to be reasonably accurate: ProbabilityDevelopmental
С
ostsRandom Numbers
0
.
3
$
2
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
0
0
-
2
9
0
.
4
4
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
3
0
-
6
9
0
.
3
6
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
7
0
-
9
9
ProbabilityProject Life
(
Years
)
Random Numbers
0
.
2
3
0
0
-
1
9
0
.
6
8
2
0
-
7
9
0
.
2
1
3
8
0
-
9
9
ProbabilitySales in UnitsRandom Numbers
0
.
2
1
0
0
0
0
-
1
9
0
.
6
2
0
0
2
0
-
7
9
0
.
2
3
0
0
8
0
-
9
9
ProbabilitySales PriceRandom Numbers
0
.
1
$
1
2
,
0
0
0
0
0
-
0
9
0
.
8
1
2
,
5
0
0
1
0
-
8
9
0
.
1
1
3
,
0
0
0
9
0
-
9
9
Cost per Unit
(
ExcludingProbabilityDevelopmental Costs
)
Random Numbers
0
.
3
$
6
,
0
0
0
0
0
-
2
9
0
.
4
7
,
0
0
0
3
0
-
6
9
0
.
3
8
,
0
0
0
7
0
-
9
9
SSC uses a cost of capital of
1
2
%
to analyze average
-
risk projects such as this one. The firm is in the
2
5
%
federal
-
plus
-
state income tax bracket. What is the expected IRR for the X
-
ray scanner project? Base your answer on the expected values of the variables.
(
Hint: You'll need to calculate the expected value of each variable. To make your calculations easier, note that because these distributions are symmetric, the expected value is also equal to the middle value.
)
Also, assume the after
-
tax "profits" figure that you develop is equal to annual cash flows. All facilities are leased, so depreciation may be disregarded. Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to two decimal places.
%
Can you determine the value of σIRR short of actual simulation or complex statistical analysis?
-
Select
-
NoYesItem
2
What is the project's NPV
?
Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to the nearest dollar.
Question:
Singleton Supplies Corporation
(
SSC
)
manufactures medical products for hospitals, clinics, and nursing homes. SSC may introduce a new type of X
-
ray scanner designed to identify certain types of cancers in their early stages. There are a number of uncertainties about the proposed project, but the following data are believed to be reasonably accurate: ProbabilityDevelopmental
С
ostsRandom Numbers
0
.
3
$
2
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
0
0
-
2
9
0
.
4
4
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
3
0
-
6
9
0
.
3
6
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
7
0
-
9
9
ProbabilityProject Life
(
Years
)
Random Numbers
0
.
2
3
0
0
-
1
9
0
.
6
8
2
0
-
7
9
0
.
2
1
3
8
0
-
9
9
ProbabilitySales in UnitsRandom Numbers
0
.
2
1
0
0
0
0
-
1
9
0
.
6
2
0
0
2
0
-
7
9
0
.
2
3
0
0
8
0
-
9
9
ProbabilitySales PriceRandom Numbers
0
.
1
$
1
2
,
0
0
0
0
0
-
0
9
0
.
8
1
2
,
5
0
0
1
0
-
8
9
0
.
1
1
3
,
0
0
0
9
0
-
9
9
Cost per Unit
(
ExcludingProbabilityDevelopmental Costs
)
Random Numbers
0
.
3
$
6
,
0
0
0
0
0
-
2
9
0
.
4
7
,
0
0
0
3
0
-
6
9
0
.
3
8
,
0
0
0
7
0
-
9
9
SSC uses a cost of capital of
1
2
%
to analyze average
-
risk projects such as this one. The firm is in the
2
5
%
federal
-
plus
-
state income tax bracket. What is the expected IRR for the X
-
ray scanner project? Base your answer on the expected values of the variables.
(
Hint: You'll need to calculate the expected value of each variable. To make your calculations easier, note that because these distributions are symmetric, the expected value is also equal to the middle value.
)
Also, assume the after
-
tax "profits" figure that you develop is equal to annual cash flows. All facilities are leased, so depreciation may be disregarded. Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to two decimal places.
%
Can you determine the value of σIRR short of actual simulation or complex statistical analysis?
-
Select
-
NoYesItem
2
What is the project's NPV
?
Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to the nearest dollar.
This is AI generated Response.
Asked by: Test User 100000
Created at: 2025-04-28 12:25:49
Final Answer:
RenderedRaw Text
Did you like this answer?
Let's break down the problem step by step:
### 1. **Expected Values for Each Variable**
**The hint says the distributions are symmetric, so the expected value is the middle value. Let's identify the three outcomes and their probabilities for each variable:**
#### **a) Developmental Costs**
| Value | Probability |
|----------|-------------|
| $2,000,000 | 0.3 |
| $4,000,000 | 0.4 |
| $6,000,000 | 0.3 |
**Expected Value:**
\[
E(Dev.\ Cost) = 0.3(2,000,000) + 0.4(4,000,000) + 0.3(6,000,000) = 600,000 + 1,600,000 + 1,800,000 = \$4,000,000
\]
#### **b) Project Life (Years)**
| Value | Probability |
|-------|-------------|
| 3 | 0.2 |
| 8 | 0.2 |
| 6 | 0.6 |
**Expected Value:**
\[
E(Life) = 0.2(3) + 0.6(6) + 0.2(8) = 0.6 + 3.6 + 1.6 = 5.8
\]
**But the "middle value" is also 6 (majority probability), so use 6 years.**
#### **c) Sales in Units**
| Value | Probability |
|-------|-------------|
| 1,000 | 0.2 |
| 2,000 | 0.6 |
| 3,000 | 0.2 |
**Expected Value:**
\[
E(Units) = 0.2(1,000) + 0.6(2,000) + 0.2(3,000) = 200 + 1,200 + 600 = 2,000
\]
#### **d) Sales Price**
| Value | Probability |
|----------|-------------|
| $12,000 | 0.1 |
| $12,500 | 0.8 |
| $13,000 | 0.1 |
**Expected Value:**
\[
E(Price) = 0.1(12,000) + 0.8(12,500) + 0.1(13,000) = 1,200 + 10,000 + 1,300 = \$12,500
\]
#### **e) Cost per Unit (Excluding Dev. Cost)**
| Value | Probability |
|----------|-------------|
| $6,000 | 0.3 |
| $7,000 | 0.4 |
| $8,000 | 0.3 |
**Expected Value:**
\[
E(Cost) = 0.3(6,000) + 0.4(7,000) + 0.3(8,000) = 1,800 + 2,800 + 2,400 = \$7,000
\]
---
### 2. **Calculate Pre-tax and After-tax Cash Flow**
#### **a) Revenue per Year**
\[
\text{Revenue} = \text{Units} \times \text{Sales Price} = 2,000 \times \$12,500 = \$25,000,000
\]
#### **b) Cost per Year (excluding Dev. Cost)**
\[
\text{Cost} = \text{Units} \times \text{Cost per Unit} = 2,000 \times \$7,000 = \$14,000,000
\]
#### **c) Pre-tax Profits per Year**
\[
\text{Pre-tax Profit} = \text{Revenue} - \text{Cost} = \$25,000,000 - \$14,000,000 = \$11,000,000
\]
#### **d) After-tax Profit per Year (equals cash flow, since no depreciation)**
\[
\text{After-tax Cash Flow} = \text{Pre-tax Profit} \times (1 - \text{Tax Rate}) = \$11,000,000 \times 0.75 = \$8,250,000
\]
---
### 3. **Initial Outlay**
\[
\text{Initial Outlay} = \text{Developmental Cost} = \$4,000,000
\]
---
### 4. **Project Life**
\[
\text{Project Life} = 6 \text{ years}
\]
---
### 5. **IRR Calculation**
The IRR is the rate \( r \) that solves:
\[
0 = -4,000,000 + \sum_{t=1}^6 \frac{8,250,000}{(1+r)^t}
\]
This is a cash flow of -4,000,000 at \( t=0 \), and then 8,250,000 per year for 6 years.
**This is a standard annuity problem:**
Set N = 6, PMT = 8,250,000, PV = -4,000,000
\[
4,000,000 = 8,250,000 \times \left[ \frac{1 - (1 + IRR)^{-6}}{IRR} \right]
\]
\[
\frac{4,000,000}{8,250,000} = \frac{1 - (1 + IRR)^{-6}}{IRR}
\]
\[
0.484848 = \frac{1 - (1 + IRR)^{-6}}{IRR}
\]
Now, solve for IRR.
This requires a financial calculator or Excel, but let's estimate:
- At IRR = 15%:
\[
\text{Annuity factor} = \frac{1 - (1+0.15)^{-6}}{0.15} = \frac{1 - (1/2.313)}{0.15} = \frac{1 - 0.432}{0.15} = \frac{0.568}{0.15} = 3.787
\]
\[
8,250,000 \times 3.787 = 31,220,250
\]
But that's way more than 4,000,000, so IRR must be much higher.
Alternatively, let's try with the cash flows:
- Year 0: -4,000,000
- Years 1-6: +8,250,000
Try IRR in Excel or with a financial calculator, or estimate:
\[
NPV = -4,000,000 + 8,250,000 \times \text{PVIFA}_{r,6}
\]
Set NPV = 0 and solve for r.
We'll use the equation:
\[
\frac{4,000,000}{8,250,000} = \frac{1 - (1 + r)^{-6}}{r}
\]
\[
0.484848 = \frac{1 - (1 + r)^{-6}}{r}
\]
Try r = 100% (1.0):
\[
(1 + 1)^6 = 64 \implies (1 + 1)^{-6} = 1/64 = 0.015625
\]
\[
1 - 0.015625 = 0.984375
\]
\[
0.984375 / 1 = 0.984375
\]
So too high.
Try r = 50% (0.5):
\[
(1.5)^6 = 11.390625 \implies (1.5)^{-6} = 1 / 11.390625 = 0.0878
\]
\[
1 - 0.0878 = 0.9122
\]
\[
0.9122 / 0.5 = 1.824
\]
Still too high.
Try r = 20% (0.2):
\[
(1.2)^6 = 2.985984 \implies (1.2)^{-6} = 1 / 2.985984 = 0.3348
\]
\[
1 - 0.3348 = 0.6652
\]
\[
0.6652 / 0.2 = 3.326
\]
Still too high.
Try r = 50% again, but let's try r = 200% (2.0):
\[
(1+2)^6 = 729 \implies (1+2)^{-6} = 1/729 = 0.00137
\]
\[
1 - 0.00137 = 0.99863
\]
\[
0.99863 / 2 = 0.499
\]
Now, 0.499 is just above 0.4848.
Try r = 210% (2.1):
\[
(1+2.1)^6 = 3.1^6 = 887.5037 \implies (1+2.1)^{-6} = 1/887.5037 = 0.001127
Question:
Continue the above answer from where it is left and finish it
This is AI generated Response.
Asked by: Test User 100000
Created at: 2025-04-28 12:27:25
Final Answer:
RenderedRaw Text
Did you like this answer?
Continuing from where we left off:
At r = 2.1 (210%):
\[
(1+2.1)^6 = 3.1^6 \approx 887.5037
\]
\[
(1+2.1)^{-6} = 1 / 887.5037 \approx 0.001127
\]
\[
1 - 0.001127 = 0.998873
\]
\[
\frac{0.998873}{2.1} \approx 0.4756
\]
This is slightly below our target of 0.4848.
Now, try r = 2.05 (205%):
\[
(1+2.05)^6 = 3.05^6 \approx 769.6
\]
\[
(1+2.05)^{-6} = 1 / 769.6 \approx 0.0013
\]
\[
1 - 0.0013 = 0.9987
\]
\[
0.9987 / 2.05 \approx 0.487
\]
This is very close to 0.4848, slightly above.
Since at r = 2.05, the ratio is approximately 0.487, and at r=2.1, it's approximately 0.476, our target of 0.4848 lies between these.
Interpolating:
\[
r \approx 2.05 + \left( \frac{0.487 - 0.4848}{0.487 - 0.476} \right) \times (2.1 - 2.05) \approx 2.05 + \left( \frac{0.0022}{0.011} \right) \times 0.05 \approx 2.05 + 0.01 \approx 2.06
\]
Expressed as a percentage:
\[
IRR \approx 206\%
\]
**Therefore, the expected IRR is approximately 206%.**
---
### 6. **Expected NPV Calculation**
Using the expected after-tax cash flow of \$8,250,000 per year for 6 years, initial outlay \$4,000,000, and discount rate 12% (cost of capital):
\[
NPV = -4,000,000 + 8,250,000 \times \text{PVIFA}_{12\%,6}
\]
PVIFA for 12% over 6 years:
\[
PVIFA_{12\%,6} = \frac{1 - (1 + 0.12)^{-6}}{0.12}
\]
Calculate:
\[
(1.12)^6 \approx 1.9738
\]
\[
(1.12)^{-6} = 1 / 1.9738 \approx 0.5067
\]
\[
PVIFA_{12\%,6} = \frac{1 - 0.5067}{0.12} = \frac{0.4933}{0.12} \approx 4.111
\]
Calculate NPV:
\[
NPV = -4,000,000 + 8,250,000 \times 4.111 \approx -4,000,000 + 33,929,775 = \$29,929,775
\]
**Final answer:**
### **Expected IRR: approximately 206.00%**
### **NPV: approximately \$29,929,775**
---
### **Summary:**
| Item | Value |
|---------|------------------------------|
| Expected IRR | **206.00%** |
| Project NPV | **\$29,929,775** |
---
### **Additional Note:**
**Can you determine the value of σIRR short of actual simulation or complex statistical analysis?**
**Answer: No** — Without simulation or advanced statistical methods, it's difficult to accurately determine the standard deviation or σIRR.
---
**Final note:** These calculations are based on expected values and the assumption of annual cash flows as profits. Actual project analysis would consider distributions, variances, and more detailed modeling.
VIPSolutions focuses on clear, step‑by‑step explanations so you can learn quickly. Whether you need an AI‑generated walkthrough or a short hint to get unstuck, each solution is organized for fast reading and easy review later.
Search similar questions, compare approaches, and bookmark the best answers for revision. Our goal is simple: quick, reliable study help that feels natural—not noisy.