VIPSolutions logo ✨ VIPSolutions

3 b . ( Inventory Management ) Consider the following EOQ problem faced by a retailer sourcing a product with quantity discounts and a known defective rate. The key EOQ information is as follows: • Annual demand: 1 0 , 0 0 0 units • Ordering setup cost: $ 3 0 0 per order • Annual holding cost: $ 0 . 4 per unit ( based on useable units ) • Insurance rate is 0 % . • Price discount scheme: Order Quantity Price per unit 0 – 3 , 0 0 0 units $ 4 . 0 0 3 , 0 0 1 – 6 , 0 0 0 units $ 3 . 9 0 > 6 , 0 0 0 units $ 3 . 8 0 In addition, we know that 2 % of the items received from your supplier are defective and cannot be sold. Defective units incur a disposal cost of $ 0 . 2 per unit immediately upon receipt and are not returned to the supplier. What is the optimal order quantity and the lowest annual total cost? Detailed solution steps are needed. Note: There is no minimum requirement for the number of examples; however, it should include relevant examples where appropriate to make your analysis convincing and well - supported. References are necessary for these examples.

Question:

3 b . ( Inventory Management ) Consider the following EOQ problem faced by a retailer sourcing a product with quantity discounts and a known defective rate. The key EOQ information is as follows: • Annual demand: 1 0 , 0 0 0 units • Ordering setup cost: $ 3 0 0 per order • Annual holding cost: $ 0 . 4 per unit ( based on useable units ) • Insurance rate is 0 % . • Price discount scheme: Order Quantity Price per unit 0 – 3 , 0 0 0 units $ 4 . 0 0 3 , 0 0 1 – 6 , 0 0 0 units $ 3 . 9 0 > 6 , 0 0 0 units $ 3 . 8 0 In addition, we know that 2 % of the items received from your supplier are defective and cannot be sold. Defective units incur a disposal cost of $ 0 . 2 per unit immediately upon receipt and are not returned to the supplier. What is the optimal order quantity and the lowest annual total cost? Detailed solution steps are needed. Note: There is no minimum requirement for the number of examples; however, it should include relevant examples where appropriate to make your analysis convincing and well - supported. References are necessary for these examples.

This is AI generated Response.
Asked by: coochbehar
Created at: 2025-06-10 01:05:02

Final Answer:

Rendered Raw Text
Did you like this answer?
Let’s solve the EOQ with **quantity discounts** and a **known defective rate**. --- ### **Step 1: Gather and Clarify Data** - **Annual demand (D)** = 10,000 units (usable units) - **Ordering cost (S)** = $300 per order - **Annual holding cost per usable unit (h)** = $0.40 - **Purchase price per unit (P):** - 0–3,000 units: $4.00 - 3,001–6,000 units: $3.90 - >6,000 units: $3.80 - **Defective rate (d)** = 2% - **Disposal cost per defective unit (cₚ)** = $0.20 - **All defective units are disposed of, not returned** - **Assume all calculations are based on usable units** --- ### **Step 2: Adjust for Defective Rate** For every order, only 98% of items received are usable. Let: - **Q** = Order quantity (total received per order) - **Usable units per order** = 0.98Q But **annual demand D is for usable units**, so: \[ \text{Number of orders per year} = \frac{D}{0.98Q} \] --- ### **Step 3: Calculate EOQ at Each Price Level** #### **A. $4.00 per unit (Q ≤ 3,000)** \[ \text{EOQ formula:}\quad Q^* = \sqrt{\frac{2DS}{h \cdot 0.98}} \] - Because holding cost is per usable unit, and there are only 98% usable units per order. Plug in values: \[ Q^* = \sqrt{\frac{2 \times 10,000 \times 300}{0.4 \times 0.98}} \] \[ = \sqrt{\frac{6,000,000}{0.392}} \] \[ = \sqrt{15,306,122.45} \] \[ \approx 3,913 \text{ units} \] But for this price bracket, **max Q = 3,000 units**. So, use **Q = 3,000**. --- #### **B. $3.90 per unit (3,001 ≤ Q ≤ 6,000)** Using EOQ formula: \[ Q^* = \sqrt{\frac{2 \times 10,000 \times 300}{0.4 \times 0.98}} \] As above, **Q\* ≈ 3,913 units**, which is within this range. So, **Q = 3,913**. --- #### **C. $3.80 per unit (Q > 6,000)** Use lower limit, **Q = 6,001**. --- ### **Step 4: Compute Total Annual Cost at Each Price Break** **Total Cost = Purchase Cost + Ordering Cost + Holding Cost + Defective Disposal Cost** Where: - **Purchase Cost:** \( P \times \text{total units ordered annually} \) - **Ordering Cost:** \( S \times \text{number of orders per year} \) - **Holding Cost:** \( h \times \text{average usable inventory} \) - **Disposal Cost:** \( c_p \times \text{number of defectives per year} \) #### **A. Q = 3,000, P = $4.00** - Orders/year: \( \frac{10,000}{0.98 \times 3,000} = 3.401 \) - Units ordered/year: \( 3,000 \times 3.401 = 10,204 \) - Purchase cost: \( 10,204 \times 4 = \$40,816 \) - Ordering cost: \( 3.401 \times 300 = \$1,020 \) - Avg. usable inventory: \( \frac{0.98 \times 3,000}{2} = 1,470 \) - Holding cost: \( 1,470 \times 0.4 = \$588 \) - Defective units/year: \( 10,204 \times 0.02 = 204 \) - Disposal cost: \( 204 \times 0.2 = \$40.8 \) **Total = \$40,816 + \$1,020 + \$588 + \$40.8 = \$42,464.8** --- #### **B. Q = 3,913, P = $3.90** - Orders/year: \( \frac{10,000}{0.98 \times 3,913} = 2.597 \) - Units ordered/year: \( 3,913 \times 2.597 = 10,164 \) - Purchase cost: \( 10,164 \times 3.90 = \$39,639.6 \) - Ordering cost: \( 2.597 \times 300 = \$779 \) - Avg. usable inventory: \( \frac{0.98 \times 3,913}{2} = 1,917 \) - Holding cost: \( 1,917 \times 0.4 = \$766.8 \) - Defective units/year: \( 10,164 \times 0.02 = 203 \) - Disposal cost: \( 203 \times 0.2 = \$40.6 \) **Total = \$39,639.6 + \$779 + \$766.8 + \$40.6 = \$41,225.98** --- #### **C. Q = 6,001, P = $3.80** - Orders/year: \( \frac{10,000}{0.98 \times 6,001} = 1.701 \) - Units ordered/year: \( 6,001 \times 1.701 = 10,206 \) - Purchase cost: \( 10,206 \times 3.80 = \$38,782.8 \) - Ordering cost: \( 1.701 \times 300 = \$510.3 \) - Avg. usable inventory: \( \frac{0.98 \times 6,001}{2} = 2,940.5 \) - Holding cost: \( 2,940.5 \times 0.4 = \$1,176.2 \) - Defective units/year: \( 10,206 \times 0.02 = 204 \) - Disposal cost: \( 204 \times 0.2 = \$40.8 \) **Total = \$38,782.8 + \$510.3 + \$1,176.2 + \$40.8 = \$40,510.1** --- ### **Step 5: Compare and Make Decision** | Order Qty | Price | Total Cost | |-----------|-------|------------| | 3,000 | $4.00 | $42,464.8 | | 3,913 | $3.90 | $41,225.98 | | 6,001 | $3.80 | $40,510.1 | **Lowest annual total cost:** \[ \boxed{Q^* = 6,001 \text{ units},\quad \text{Total Cost} = \$40,510.10} \] --- ## **Summary Table** | Order Quantity | Price per unit | Total Cost | |----------------|---------------|-------------| | 3,000 | $4.00 | $42,464.80 | | 3,913 | $3.90 | $41,225.98 | | 6,001 | $3.80 | $40,510.10 | ### **Optimal Policy:** Order **6,001 units** each time, pay **$3.80 per unit**, and incur a total annual cost of **$40,510.10**. --- ## **References and Further Reading** - Nahmias, S. (2013). *Production and Operations Analysis* (7th Ed.), McGraw-Hill. (See EOQ with defective items and quantity discounts) - Silver, E.A., Pyke, D.F., & Thomas, D.J. (2017). *Inventory and Production Management in Supply Chains* (4th Ed.), CRC Press. (Section: EOQ with non-perfect quality items) - Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2015). *Supply Chain Management* (6th Ed.), Pearson. (Section: Quantity discounts and EOQ) ### **Example** Suppose a company faces a 2% defective rate and quantity discounts as above. If they order 6,001 units, they will receive 120 defective units per order (2% of 6,001), which will be disposed of immediately at a cost. The rest are usable, and the calculation above shows the cost-minimizing policy. --- **If you need a spreadsheet version or sensitivity analysis, let me know!**

📢 Instructions:

  • Ask anything relatd to above question only.
  • For new Question goto :

Study Help, Fast Answers

VIPSolutions focuses on clear, step‑by‑step explanations so you can learn quickly. Whether you need an AI‑generated walkthrough or a short hint to get unstuck, each solution is organized for fast reading and easy review later.

Search similar questions, compare approaches, and bookmark the best answers for revision. Our goal is simple: quick, reliable study help that feels natural—not noisy.