(5) The trichotomy law for real numbers states that for any two real
numbers z and y, one and only one of x = y, or z < y, or y < x holds
true. Use this to prove the cancellation law for inequalities in R:
(i) z+y < z+ z implies y < z, (ii) zy < zz for z > 0 implies y < z,
and (iii) zy < zz for z < 0 implies y > z.
(5 points for each)
Question:
(5) The trichotomy law for real numbers states that for any two real
numbers z and y, one and only one of x = y, or z < y, or y < x holds
true. Use this to prove the cancellation law for inequalities in R:
(i) z+y < z+ z implies y < z, (ii) zy < zz for z > 0 implies y < z,
and (iii) zy < zz for z < 0 implies y > z.
(5 points for each)
This is AI generated Response.
Asked by: Test User 100161
Created at: 2025-05-06 07:50:46
Final Answer:
RenderedRaw Text
Did you like this answer?
Here’s how to use the **trichotomy law** to prove the cancellation law for inequalities in \(\mathbb{R}\):
**Recall:** The trichotomy law says for any two real numbers \(x\) and \(y\), exactly one of \(x = y\), \(x < y\), or \(y < x\) is true.
---
### (i) \(x + y < x + z \implies y < z\)
**Proof:**
Suppose \(x + y < x + z\).
By the trichotomy law applied to \(y\) and \(z\), exactly one of the following is true:
1. \(y = z\)
2. \(y < z\)
3. \(z < y\)
- **Case 1:** If \(y = z\), then \(x + y = x + z\), which contradicts \(x + y < x + z\).
- **Case 2:** If \(y < z\), this matches the desired conclusion.
- **Case 3:** If \(z < y\), then \(x + z < x + y\), contradicting \(x + y < x + z\).
So the only possibility is \(y < z\).
---
### (ii) \(xy < xz\) for \(x > 0\) implies \(y < z\)
**Proof:**
Suppose \(x > 0\) and \(xy < xz\).
By the trichotomy law for \(y\) and \(z\), one of:
1. \(y = z\)
2. \(y < z\)
3. \(z < y\)
- **Case 1:** If \(y = z\), then \(xy = xz\), contradicting \(xy < xz\).
- **Case 2:** If \(y < z\), then, since \(x > 0\), multiplying both sides by \(x\) preserves the inequality: \(xy < xz\), which matches the assumption.
- **Case 3:** If \(z < y\), then \(x z < x y\), which contradicts \(xy < xz\).
So the only possibility is \(y < z\).
---
### (iii) \(xy < xz\) for \(x < 0\) implies \(y > z\)
**Proof:**
Suppose \(x < 0\) and \(xy < xz\).
By the trichotomy law for \(y\) and \(z\):
1. \(y = z\)
2. \(y < z\)
3. \(z < y\)
- **Case 1:** If \(y = z\), then \(xy = xz\), contradicting \(xy < xz\).
- **Case 2:** If \(y < z\), then, since \(x < 0\), multiplying both sides by \(x\) reverses the inequality: \(xy > xz\), which contradicts \(xy < xz\).
- **Case 3:** If \(z < y\), then multiplying both sides by \(x < 0\) reverses the inequality: \(xz > xy\), which is equivalent to \(xy < xz\). So \(z < y\) is possible, which is \(y > z\).
So the only possibility is \(y > z\).
---
**Summary Table:**
| Statement | Reasoning via Trichotomy Law |
|-----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
| \(x+y < x+z \implies y < z\) | Only \(y < z\) avoids contradiction with the inequality |
| \(xy < xz\), \(x>0 \implies y < z\) | Only \(y < z\) makes \(xy < xz\) when \(x > 0\) |
| \(xy < xz\), \(x<0 \implies y > z\) | Only \(y > z\) makes \(xy < xz\) when \(x < 0\) |
VIPSolutions focuses on clear, step‑by‑step explanations so you can learn quickly. Whether you need an AI‑generated walkthrough or a short hint to get unstuck, each solution is organized for fast reading and easy review later.
Search similar questions, compare approaches, and bookmark the best answers for revision. Our goal is simple: quick, reliable study help that feels natural—not noisy.